Rural inequalities in Britain: Undisciplining rural histories/connected histories and collaborative methods

Abstract This article asks what would happen if scholars from a broad range of disciplines began to work together to think about, first, what histories of class look like in a rural context and, secondly, whether working in a more holistic way might generate new historical perspectives on the shape and persistence of rural inequalities in Britain. It is structured around three problems and methodological provocations that range across disciplines, genres, voices, and perspectives, as it scopes creative and collaborative methods that might disrupt the assumptions that underpin our understandings of the multivarious ways in which histories of inequality have shaped and continue to shape unequal access to resources in the present. It asks what methods we might use to produce more diverse, place-based histories of the rural that surface the spectrum of violences and injustices that take place around resource and rights distributions in the rural context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rural History
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956793326100351
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Rural inequalities in Britain: Undisciplining rural histories/connected histories and collaborative methods

Imogen Tyler, Ben Garlick, Yvette Taylor, George J. Severs et al.
Rural History
Rural development and sustainability
article

Rural inequalities in Britain: Undisciplining rural histories/connected histories and collaborative methods

Imogen Tyler, Ben Garlick, Yvette Taylor, George J. Severs, Annie Tindley, Julie‐Marie Strange, Alf Ellis, Clare Whistler
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article asks what would happen if scholars from a broad range of disciplines began to work together to think about, first, what histories of class look like in a rural context and, secondly, whether working in a more holistic way might generate new historical perspectives on the shape and persistence of rural inequalities in Britain. It is structured around three problems and methodological provocations that range across disciplines, genres, voices, and perspectives, as it scopes creative and collaborative methods that might disrupt the assumptions that underpin our understandings of the multivarious ways in which histories of inequality have shaped and continue to shape unequal access to resources in the present. It asks what methods we might use to produce more diverse, place-based histories of the rural that surface the spectrum of violences and injustices that take place around resource and rights distributions in the rural context.

Rural History
University of Strathclyde (GB), Durham University (GB), Heidelberg University (DE), Lancaster University (GB), University of Newcastle Australia (AU), Newcastle University (GB), Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Rural development and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rural inequalities in Britain: Undisciplining rural histories/connected histories and collaborative methods — Imogen Tyler, Ben Garlick, et al. · Rural History (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS