Chronic Pain Management in Primary Care: A Review of Practical, Individualized Approaches for Clinical Practice

Background: Chronic pain is a complex condition affecting approximately 20–30% of adults worldwide. Increasing evidence demonstrates that chronic pain is a heterogeneous condition influenced by biological mechanisms, psychological factors, social circumstances and individual patient characteristics. These differences contribute to variable treatment responses and highlight the need for individualized clinical care. Objective: This narrative review provides a practical, clinical framework for individualized chronic pain management in primary care, emphasizing mechanism-informed clinical phenotyping, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions, shared decision-making, continuous reassessment and practical implementation within time-constrained practice settings. Methods: A non-systematic literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and current international clinical guidelines (e.g., IASP, ICD-11, NICE, and CDC) was conducted for contemporary literature published from 2015 to 2026. Evidence was qualitatively selected and synthesized regarding pain mechanisms, primary care assessment, non-pharmacological therapies, modern pharmacotherapy, and health implementation frameworks. Results: Individualized chronic pain care requires the identification of contributing clinical pain mechanisms—nociceptive, neuropathic, nociplastic or mixed—while recognizing that these exist on a continuum rather than as mutually exclusive entities. Effective primary care management prioritizes active non-pharmacological interventions (exercise, pain neuroscience education as part of multidisciplinary rehabilitation, psychological therapies and sleep optimization) followed by selective, mechanism-informed pharmacotherapy. Regular reassessment using multidimensional functional criteria is essential for the optimization of benefit while minimizing treatment-related harms. Conclusion: Primary care clinicians are well positioned to deliver individualized chronic pain management through longitudinal relationships, clinical phenotyping, physical examination and coordinated multimodal care. An individualized approach focused on patient-defined functional goals provides a practical model for improving outcomes in primary care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16100507
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Opioid Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Chronic Pain Management in Primary Care: A Review of Practical, Individualized Approaches for Clinical Practice

Imran Yaseen Gani, Ahmad Mirza, Shameem Beigh
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Pain Management and Opioid Use
article

Chronic Pain Management in Primary Care: A Review of Practical, Individualized Approaches for Clinical Practice

Imran Yaseen Gani, Ahmad Mirza, Shameem Beigh
article en

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain is a complex condition affecting approximately 20–30% of adults worldwide. Increasing evidence demonstrates that chronic pain is a heterogeneous condition influenced by biological mechanisms, psychological factors, social circumstances and individual patient characteristics. These differences contribute to variable treatment responses and highlight the need for individualized clinical care. Objective: This narrative review provides a practical, clinical framework for individualized chronic pain management in primary care, emphasizing mechanism-informed clinical phenotyping, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions, shared decision-making, continuous reassessment and practical implementation within time-constrained practice settings. Methods: A non-systematic literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and current international clinical guidelines (e.g., IASP, ICD-11, NICE, and CDC) was conducted for contemporary literature published from 2015 to 2026. Evidence was qualitatively selected and synthesized regarding pain mechanisms, primary care assessment, non-pharmacological therapies, modern pharmacotherapy, and health implementation frameworks. Results: Individualized chronic pain care requires the identification of contributing clinical pain mechanisms—nociceptive, neuropathic, nociplastic or mixed—while recognizing that these exist on a continuum rather than as mutually exclusive entities. Effective primary care management prioritizes active non-pharmacological interventions (exercise, pain neuroscience education as part of multidisciplinary rehabilitation, psychological therapies and sleep optimization) followed by selective, mechanism-informed pharmacotherapy. Regular reassessment using multidimensional functional criteria is essential for the optimization of benefit while minimizing treatment-related harms. Conclusion: Primary care clinicians are well positioned to deliver individualized chronic pain management through longitudinal relationships, clinical phenotyping, physical examination and coordinated multimodal care. An individualized approach focused on patient-defined functional goals provides a practical model for improving outcomes in primary care.

Journal of Personalized MedicineVol. 16(10)
Augusta University Health (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pain Management and Opioid Use
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.