Nocturnal Lepidoptera Larvae in Mega‐Project: Habitat and Environmental Factors Over Construction Effects

ABSTRACT Mega‐projects are large‐scale developments that profoundly transform landscapes while delivering infrastructure and socio‐economic benefits. However, they are also major drivers of biodiversity loss through multiple direct and indirect impacts. Among these, artificial light at night (ALAN) is increasingly recognised as a threat to biodiversity, including nocturnal Lepidoptera, which play crucial ecological roles. While ALAN effects on adult moths are well documented, its influence on preimaginal stages, critical for fitness and population persistence, remains poorly understood. This study examined construction‐related factors, including ALAN effects, on Lepidoptera larvae in natural environments within mega‐projects context using an After‐Control‐Impact (ACI) design. Focusing on larvae is essential, as this longest and least mobile life stage is particularly vulnerable to local environmental alterations such as artificial lighting, and environmental complexity can either buffer or amplify ALAN effects. However, our findings indicate that larval presence, species richness and biomass were not consistently associated with ALAN intensity. Instead, other environmental factors, including habitat characteristics, plant species, exposure and vegetation management, emerged as more important determinants of larval assemblages. In two sites, at least one control area showed higher larval abundance than the impacted site, but this pattern appears linked more to local environmental conditions than to lighting. Species richness showed no consistent pattern, and biomass analyses were limited by sample size and developmental variability. Overall, the results highlight that mega‐project impacts on nocturnal Lepidoptera larvae are complex and context‐dependent. ALAN was not retained as a significant predictor relative to other environmental factors, though this may reflect limited statistical power rather than a true absence of effect. These findings emphasise the need for standardised approaches to mitigate multiple construction‐related impacts on nocturnal Lepidoptera.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.74296
Primary Topic
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Nocturnal Lepidoptera Larvae in Mega‐Project: Habitat and Environmental Factors Over Construction Effects

Denise Trombin, Eleni Matechou, Simona Bonelli, Luca Dessì et al.
Ecology and Evolution
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
article

Nocturnal Lepidoptera Larvae in Mega‐Project: Habitat and Environmental Factors Over Construction Effects

Denise Trombin, Eleni Matechou, Simona Bonelli, Luca Dessì, Irene Piccini, P. Mazzei, P. Grieco
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Mega‐projects are large‐scale developments that profoundly transform landscapes while delivering infrastructure and socio‐economic benefits. However, they are also major drivers of biodiversity loss through multiple direct and indirect impacts. Among these, artificial light at night (ALAN) is increasingly recognised as a threat to biodiversity, including nocturnal Lepidoptera, which play crucial ecological roles. While ALAN effects on adult moths are well documented, its influence on preimaginal stages, critical for fitness and population persistence, remains poorly understood. This study examined construction‐related factors, including ALAN effects, on Lepidoptera larvae in natural environments within mega‐projects context using an After‐Control‐Impact (ACI) design. Focusing on larvae is essential, as this longest and least mobile life stage is particularly vulnerable to local environmental alterations such as artificial lighting, and environmental complexity can either buffer or amplify ALAN effects. However, our findings indicate that larval presence, species richness and biomass were not consistently associated with ALAN intensity. Instead, other environmental factors, including habitat characteristics, plant species, exposure and vegetation management, emerged as more important determinants of larval assemblages. In two sites, at least one control area showed higher larval abundance than the impacted site, but this pattern appears linked more to local environmental conditions than to lighting. Species richness showed no consistent pattern, and biomass analyses were limited by sample size and developmental variability. Overall, the results highlight that mega‐project impacts on nocturnal Lepidoptera larvae are complex and context‐dependent. ALAN was not retained as a significant predictor relative to other environmental factors, though this may reflect limited statistical power rather than a true absence of effect. These findings emphasise the need for standardised approaches to mitigate multiple construction‐related impacts on nocturnal Lepidoptera.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 16(10)
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” (IT), Queen Mary University of London (GB), 5T Torino (Italy) (IT), University of Turin (IT), University of Life Sciences in Poznań (PL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.