Harnessing Quantitative Medicine to Advance Oncology Drug Development

Oncology drug development continues to have a high attrition rate despite major advances in therapeutic modalities such as antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, cell therapies, and cancer vaccines. Critical development decisions are often made under substantial uncertainty, creating a need for quantitative approaches that integrate diverse sources of evidence. Quantitative medicine (QM) and model-informed drug development (MIDD) provide a framework to support decision-making throughout the oncology drug development lifecycle by leveraging pharmacology, disease biology, clinical data, biomarkers, and computational modeling. This review highlights three potential applications of QM that address drug development challenges. First, tumor growth inhibition-overall survival (TGI-OS) modeling links longitudinal tumor dynamics with survival outcomes, enabling earlier assessment of treatment benefit and supporting Phase III go/no-go decisions using Phase Ib/II data. Second, pan-molecule modeling across multiple antibody-drug conjugates that share a common linker-payload construct. This QM approach characterizes the class-specific exposure-toxicity relationships and informs dose optimization strategies, as illustrated by peripheral neuropathy risk modeling for vc-MMAE-containing agents. Third, population pharmacokinetic modeling and clinical trial simulation can facilitate intravenous-to-subcutaneous bridging by predicting pharmacokinetic non-inferiority, optimizing dose selection, and reducing development risk, as demonstrated for pertuzumab/trastuzumab and atezolizumab. Collectively, these examples demonstrate how QM can improve confidence in critical development decisions, optimize benefit-risk assessment, and enhance development efficiency. Continued integration of quantitative approaches, including emerging artificial intelligence and mechanistic modeling methodologies, has the potential to improve the probability of success and accelerate the delivery of effective oncology therapies to patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70733
Primary Topic
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Harnessing Quantitative Medicine to Advance Oncology Drug Development

Pascal Chanu, Chunze Li, Kenta J. Yoshida, Benjamin Wu
Clinical and Translational Science
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
article

Harnessing Quantitative Medicine to Advance Oncology Drug Development

Pascal Chanu, Chunze Li, Kenta J. Yoshida, Benjamin Wu
article en

Abstract

Oncology drug development continues to have a high attrition rate despite major advances in therapeutic modalities such as antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, cell therapies, and cancer vaccines. Critical development decisions are often made under substantial uncertainty, creating a need for quantitative approaches that integrate diverse sources of evidence. Quantitative medicine (QM) and model-informed drug development (MIDD) provide a framework to support decision-making throughout the oncology drug development lifecycle by leveraging pharmacology, disease biology, clinical data, biomarkers, and computational modeling. This review highlights three potential applications of QM that address drug development challenges. First, tumor growth inhibition-overall survival (TGI-OS) modeling links longitudinal tumor dynamics with survival outcomes, enabling earlier assessment of treatment benefit and supporting Phase III go/no-go decisions using Phase Ib/II data. Second, pan-molecule modeling across multiple antibody-drug conjugates that share a common linker-payload construct. This QM approach characterizes the class-specific exposure-toxicity relationships and informs dose optimization strategies, as illustrated by peripheral neuropathy risk modeling for vc-MMAE-containing agents. Third, population pharmacokinetic modeling and clinical trial simulation can facilitate intravenous-to-subcutaneous bridging by predicting pharmacokinetic non-inferiority, optimizing dose selection, and reducing development risk, as demonstrated for pertuzumab/trastuzumab and atezolizumab. Collectively, these examples demonstrate how QM can improve confidence in critical development decisions, optimize benefit-risk assessment, and enhance development efficiency. Continued integration of quantitative approaches, including emerging artificial intelligence and mechanistic modeling methodologies, has the potential to improve the probability of success and accelerate the delivery of effective oncology therapies to patients.

Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 19(10)
Genentech
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Harnessing Quantitative Medicine to Advance Oncology Drug Development — Pascal Chanu, Chunze Li, et al. · Clinical and Translational Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS