Cross-ideological sharing and counterargument

Exposure to different perspectives can foster tolerance, a fundamental principle in democratic societies. Whether social media facilitates the exchange of diverse views is subject to debate. Specifically, it is unclear how often content is shared by diverse users and whether users accompany cross-ideological content with counterarguments. To address this, we collected tweets containing URLs posted on days during which four major events took place in the summer of 2021: the Biden-Putin summit, COVID-19, the #FreeBritney movement, and the MLB All-Star Game. We analyze 1,274,792 tweets across 80,130 active U.S.-based users who tweeted about these topics. We find that a lack of diversity was the modal sharing pattern for partisan topics, the Biden-Putin summit and COVID-19, compared to non-partisan topics, baseball and Britney Spears. Sharing patterns further reveal that URLs related to the more partisan topics tend to circulate among politically like-minded users, whereas non-partisan topics are predominantly shared by users with moderate political leanings. Overall, cross-ideological sharing is rare, but when users share cross-ideological content, they tend to include counterarguments. The findings highlight the need for strategies that promote diverse and constructive information exchange on social media platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-09261-x
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Cross-ideological sharing and counterargument

Natalie Jomini Stroud, Yujin Kim
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Social Media and Politics
article

Cross-ideological sharing and counterargument

Natalie Jomini Stroud, Yujin Kim
article en

Abstract

Exposure to different perspectives can foster tolerance, a fundamental principle in democratic societies. Whether social media facilitates the exchange of diverse views is subject to debate. Specifically, it is unclear how often content is shared by diverse users and whether users accompany cross-ideological content with counterarguments. To address this, we collected tweets containing URLs posted on days during which four major events took place in the summer of 2021: the Biden-Putin summit, COVID-19, the #FreeBritney movement, and the MLB All-Star Game. We analyze 1,274,792 tweets across 80,130 active U.S.-based users who tweeted about these topics. We find that a lack of diversity was the modal sharing pattern for partisan topics, the Biden-Putin summit and COVID-19, compared to non-partisan topics, baseball and Britney Spears. Sharing patterns further reveal that URLs related to the more partisan topics tend to circulate among politically like-minded users, whereas non-partisan topics are predominantly shared by users with moderate political leanings. Overall, cross-ideological sharing is rare, but when users share cross-ideological content, they tend to include counterarguments. The findings highlight the need for strategies that promote diverse and constructive information exchange on social media platforms.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Wesleyan University (US), Austin College (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cross-ideological sharing and counterargument — Natalie Jomini Stroud, Yujin Kim · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS