Beyond regulation: adaptive responses of nonregulated SMEs to mandatory CSR reporting

Purpose This study aims to examine whether mandatory sustainability/corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure generates spillover effects beyond firms directly subject to regulation. While prior research focuses mainly on direct compliance effects, little is known about whether disclosure mandates reshape reporting practices among nonregulated firms, despite the relevance of this question for current debates on the scope of European Union (EU) sustainability regulation. Design/methodology/approach Using Sweden’s implementation of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) as a natural experiment, the study exploits statutory size thresholds that distinguish directly regulated firms from nonregulated listed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) within a common institutional environment. A generalized difference-in-differences design estimates reform effects for directly regulated Swedish firms and nonregulated Swedish SMEs relative to non-EU manufacturing firms, while using variation in SMEs’ distance from the thresholds to identify spillover effects. CSR reporting is measured using hand-collected annual and CSR reports and issue-level coding of substantive disclosures based on a SASB materiality framework. Findings Nonregulated SMEs close to the thresholds increase CSR reporting substantially following the reform, with stronger effects among firms with low pre-reform reporting levels. The findings indicate that mandatory disclosure can generate meaningful spillover effects beyond formally regulated firms and that firms near regulatory thresholds may respond strongly even when legally outside the mandate. Originality/value The study shows that mandatory CSR disclosure can reshape reporting practices among firms legally outside the mandate. It theorizes regulatory thresholds as institutional boundary markers that heighten visibility, stakeholder expectations and uncertainty about future inclusion, linking targeted transparency with spillover coercive and mimetic pressures beyond formal compliance boundaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-09-2025-0355
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Beyond regulation: adaptive responses of nonregulated SMEs to mandatory CSR reporting

Fredrik Hartwig, Niklas Rudholm, Asif M. Huq, Wensong Bai
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Beyond regulation: adaptive responses of nonregulated SMEs to mandatory CSR reporting

Fredrik Hartwig, Niklas Rudholm, Asif M. Huq, Wensong Bai
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine whether mandatory sustainability/corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure generates spillover effects beyond firms directly subject to regulation. While prior research focuses mainly on direct compliance effects, little is known about whether disclosure mandates reshape reporting practices among nonregulated firms, despite the relevance of this question for current debates on the scope of European Union (EU) sustainability regulation. Design/methodology/approach Using Sweden’s implementation of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) as a natural experiment, the study exploits statutory size thresholds that distinguish directly regulated firms from nonregulated listed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) within a common institutional environment. A generalized difference-in-differences design estimates reform effects for directly regulated Swedish firms and nonregulated Swedish SMEs relative to non-EU manufacturing firms, while using variation in SMEs’ distance from the thresholds to identify spillover effects. CSR reporting is measured using hand-collected annual and CSR reports and issue-level coding of substantive disclosures based on a SASB materiality framework. Findings Nonregulated SMEs close to the thresholds increase CSR reporting substantially following the reform, with stronger effects among firms with low pre-reform reporting levels. The findings indicate that mandatory disclosure can generate meaningful spillover effects beyond formally regulated firms and that firms near regulatory thresholds may respond strongly even when legally outside the mandate. Originality/value The study shows that mandatory CSR disclosure can reshape reporting practices among firms legally outside the mandate. It theorizes regulatory thresholds as institutional boundary markers that heighten visibility, stakeholder expectations and uncertainty about future inclusion, linking targeted transparency with spillover coercive and mimetic pressures beyond formal compliance boundaries.

Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change
Stockholm School of Economics (SE), University of Gävle (SE), Shenzhen MSU-BIT University
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.