Nurses' Perspectives on a Communication Model Between Providers and Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

ABSTRACT Background Communication with mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care is complex. Decades of research demonstrate that communication barriers are commonly experienced and one of the most challenging experiences during an intensive care stay. Support for the health care providers in these situations could be a model for communication, guiding the interaction. Aim The aim of this study was to examine critical care nurses' (CCNs') perspectives of the clinical relevance and applicability of a communication model for mechanically ventilated patients. Study Design Qualitative, explorative design in accordance with Im & Meleis' phases of development of situation‐specific theories. We conducted six focus group interviews with CCNs from Denmark, Norway and the United States, two in each country, lasting between 58 and 90 min. The interviews were analysed by a content analytic approach with both inductive and deductive phases. Findings Twenty‐nine CCNs participated in the focus group interviews. The main category was identified during the analysis, which was: ‘Relationship‐building as a starting point for meaningful communication’. The main category was further described by three subcategories: (1) Patients' abilities and challenges in communication while being mechanically ventilated. (2) Nurses' competencies and strategies for effective communication with mechanically ventilated patients and (3) Tools and resources in practice. Conclusions The nurses' perspectives yielded a deeper understanding of how clinical practice both corresponds to and departs from a theoretical lens. Given that the interviews with nurses revealed the relational component as a critical starting point of communication, the model should highlight this specific element more explicitly. To understand the complexity occurring in the daily practice of an ICU, a situation‐specific theory will be useful for providing examples of good practice. Relevance to Clinical Practice Communication in an ICU setting requires the establishment of a relationship to find effective ways to communicate. Integrating clinical perspectives can refine and adapt the preliminary model to the real communication encounters and improve care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing in Critical Care
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70706
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Nurses' Perspectives on a Communication Model Between Providers and Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

Pia Dreyer, Judith Ann Tate, Marte‐Marie Wallander Karlsen, Monica Evelyn Kvande et al.
Nursing in Critical Care
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Nurses' Perspectives on a Communication Model Between Providers and Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

Pia Dreyer, Judith Ann Tate, Marte‐Marie Wallander Karlsen, Monica Evelyn Kvande, Lena Günterberg Heyn, Mary Beth Happ, Anna Holm
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Communication with mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care is complex. Decades of research demonstrate that communication barriers are commonly experienced and one of the most challenging experiences during an intensive care stay. Support for the health care providers in these situations could be a model for communication, guiding the interaction. Aim The aim of this study was to examine critical care nurses' (CCNs') perspectives of the clinical relevance and applicability of a communication model for mechanically ventilated patients. Study Design Qualitative, explorative design in accordance with Im & Meleis' phases of development of situation‐specific theories. We conducted six focus group interviews with CCNs from Denmark, Norway and the United States, two in each country, lasting between 58 and 90 min. The interviews were analysed by a content analytic approach with both inductive and deductive phases. Findings Twenty‐nine CCNs participated in the focus group interviews. The main category was identified during the analysis, which was: ‘Relationship‐building as a starting point for meaningful communication’. The main category was further described by three subcategories: (1) Patients' abilities and challenges in communication while being mechanically ventilated. (2) Nurses' competencies and strategies for effective communication with mechanically ventilated patients and (3) Tools and resources in practice. Conclusions The nurses' perspectives yielded a deeper understanding of how clinical practice both corresponds to and departs from a theoretical lens. Given that the interviews with nurses revealed the relational component as a critical starting point of communication, the model should highlight this specific element more explicitly. To understand the complexity occurring in the daily practice of an ICU, a situation‐specific theory will be useful for providing examples of good practice. Relevance to Clinical Practice Communication in an ICU setting requires the establishment of a relationship to find effective ways to communicate. Integrating clinical perspectives can refine and adapt the preliminary model to the real communication encounters and improve care.

Nursing in Critical CareVol. 31(6)
Aarhus University (DK), University of South-Eastern Norway (NO), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Lovisenberg Diakonale Høgskole (NO), The Ohio State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.