The Institutional Trilemma of Sustainable Development: Reconciling Digitalization, Entrepreneurship, and Green‐Inclusive Growth

ABSTRACT This study investigates the institutional trilemma of sustainable development by assessing the impact of digitalization, entrepreneurship, and related structural factors on green‐inclusive growth in five selected E7 economies for the period 2000–2023. Adjusted Net Savings with damage of particulate‐emission is a measure of green‐inclusive growth. The empirical analysis relies on second generation panel methods, including tests for cross‐sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity, CIPS and CADF unit‐root procedures, Westerlund cointegration analysis, Method of Moments Quantile Regression and Mean Group estimation as robustness checks. The results show that there is cross‐sectional dependence, heterogeneous slope coefficients, and a stable long‐run relationship between the variables. The mobile connectivity, domestic credit to the private sector (DCP) and self‐employment make positive contributions to the green‐inclusive growth over the studied quantiles. Internet use and renewable‐energy consumption have negative impacts on the green‐inclusive growth. Trade openness does not show a consistently significant effect on green‐inclusive growth. The robustness results also indicate that some of the relationships are country‐specific, emphasizing the heterogeneous nature of sustainable‐development dynamics. Taken together the results suggest that digitalization and entrepreneurship can contribute to sustainable development, if supported by efficient banking systems, environmentally orientated infrastructure and inclusive policy frameworks. Thus, policies should seek to improve sustainable digital infrastructure, channel credit to productive activities, stimulate entrepreneurship and increase the effectiveness of the renewable‐energy transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71720
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Institutional Trilemma of Sustainable Development: Reconciling Digitalization, Entrepreneurship, and Green‐Inclusive Growth

Qiu Chenxi, Salman Rashid
Sustainable Development
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

The Institutional Trilemma of Sustainable Development: Reconciling Digitalization, Entrepreneurship, and Green‐Inclusive Growth

Qiu Chenxi, Salman Rashid
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the institutional trilemma of sustainable development by assessing the impact of digitalization, entrepreneurship, and related structural factors on green‐inclusive growth in five selected E7 economies for the period 2000–2023. Adjusted Net Savings with damage of particulate‐emission is a measure of green‐inclusive growth. The empirical analysis relies on second generation panel methods, including tests for cross‐sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity, CIPS and CADF unit‐root procedures, Westerlund cointegration analysis, Method of Moments Quantile Regression and Mean Group estimation as robustness checks. The results show that there is cross‐sectional dependence, heterogeneous slope coefficients, and a stable long‐run relationship between the variables. The mobile connectivity, domestic credit to the private sector (DCP) and self‐employment make positive contributions to the green‐inclusive growth over the studied quantiles. Internet use and renewable‐energy consumption have negative impacts on the green‐inclusive growth. Trade openness does not show a consistently significant effect on green‐inclusive growth. The robustness results also indicate that some of the relationships are country‐specific, emphasizing the heterogeneous nature of sustainable‐development dynamics. Taken together the results suggest that digitalization and entrepreneurship can contribute to sustainable development, if supported by efficient banking systems, environmentally orientated infrastructure and inclusive policy frameworks. Thus, policies should seek to improve sustainable digital infrastructure, channel credit to productive activities, stimulate entrepreneurship and increase the effectiveness of the renewable‐energy transition.

Sustainable Development
University of Northampton (GB), Jiaxing University (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.