The Global Research Lifecycle Ecosystem: Reframing Research Capacity Strengthening at the Nexus of Systems, Development, and Digital Infrastructure

Huge sums in billions of dollars have been poured into research capacity strengthening (RCS) over the last two decades, yet the return on this investment in low- and middle-income countries remains frustratingly uneven. Despite more training and better funding, systemic issues, such as weak data practices, poor reproducibility, and the failure to translate findings into policy, persist. We argue that the problem is not a lack of resources, but a flaw in design. Most capacity-building efforts still rely on linear, “pipeline” models that treat research as a series of isolated skills to be learned, rather than an interconnected system to be managed. In this perspective, we introduce the Global Research Lifecycle Ecosystem (GRLE) as a diagnostic framework to identify and mitigate these systemic failures. This framework shifts the focus from individual training to ecosystem performance. Unlike traditional models, the GRLE maps the messy, real-world interactions between people, digital tools, and institutional incentives. We define “Lifecycle Coherence” as a core design principle for Digital Research Infrastructure (DRI), utilizing unified metadata schemas and automated audit trails to ensure data integrity. We show how “ecosystem failures,” like disconnected data governance or perverse promotion criteria, create a cascade of inefficiency that undermines development goals. We also examine the double-edged sword of digital infrastructure and AI: technologies that can either bridge these gaps or widen them, depending on how they are deployed. Through illustrative use cases involving national and global funding agencies (e.g., EDCTP, Global Fund, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation), we conclude with a call to funders and institutions to move beyond fragmented projects and embrace ecosystem stewardship, ensuring research investments actually serve the Sustainable Development Goals and AU Agenda 2063.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.179057.2
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Global Research Lifecycle Ecosystem: Reframing Research Capacity Strengthening at the Nexus of Systems, Development, and Digital Infrastructure

Ahmed Adebowale Adedeji, Kudirat Aderonke Adedeji, Oluremi Nurudeen Olaleye
F1000Research
Research Data Management Practices
article

The Global Research Lifecycle Ecosystem: Reframing Research Capacity Strengthening at the Nexus of Systems, Development, and Digital Infrastructure

Ahmed Adebowale Adedeji, Kudirat Aderonke Adedeji, Oluremi Nurudeen Olaleye
article en

Abstract

Huge sums in billions of dollars have been poured into research capacity strengthening (RCS) over the last two decades, yet the return on this investment in low- and middle-income countries remains frustratingly uneven. Despite more training and better funding, systemic issues, such as weak data practices, poor reproducibility, and the failure to translate findings into policy, persist. We argue that the problem is not a lack of resources, but a flaw in design. Most capacity-building efforts still rely on linear, “pipeline” models that treat research as a series of isolated skills to be learned, rather than an interconnected system to be managed. In this perspective, we introduce the Global Research Lifecycle Ecosystem (GRLE) as a diagnostic framework to identify and mitigate these systemic failures. This framework shifts the focus from individual training to ecosystem performance. Unlike traditional models, the GRLE maps the messy, real-world interactions between people, digital tools, and institutional incentives. We define “Lifecycle Coherence” as a core design principle for Digital Research Infrastructure (DRI), utilizing unified metadata schemas and automated audit trails to ensure data integrity. We show how “ecosystem failures,” like disconnected data governance or perverse promotion criteria, create a cascade of inefficiency that undermines development goals. We also examine the double-edged sword of digital infrastructure and AI: technologies that can either bridge these gaps or widen them, depending on how they are deployed. Through illustrative use cases involving national and global funding agencies (e.g., EDCTP, Global Fund, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation), we conclude with a call to funders and institutions to move beyond fragmented projects and embrace ecosystem stewardship, ensuring research investments actually serve the Sustainable Development Goals and AU Agenda 2063.

F1000ResearchVol. 15
Lagos State University of Science and Technology (NG), University of Rwanda (RW), Foresight Institute of Research and Translation (Rwanda) (RW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.