Responsible and sustainable use of AIGC image tools in art education: an SEM–ANN–fsQCA study

Purpose This study examines how responsible and sustainable use intention (RSU) toward artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) image tools is formed in higher education art and design classrooms. Existing research has mainly explained generative AI use through technology acceptance or continuance logic, while paying limited attention to the aesthetic, authenticity-related and classroom-governance conditions under which long-term use becomes norm-compliant and educationally sustainable. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on the stimuli, organismic states and response (S–O–R) framework, this study models perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and perceived classroom digital fairness as stimuli; digital aesthetic fatigue, authenticity–authorship anxiety and perceived authenticity of AIGC images as organismic states; and RSU as the response. GenAI literacy is included as a moderator. Data from 1,238 higher education art and design students were analysed using PLS-SEM, ANN and fsQCA. Findings Classroom use of AIGC image tools is better understood as a responsible post-adoption process than as a general technology acceptance issue. Perceived authenticity is the strongest positive predictor of RSU, digital aesthetic fatigue is the strongest negative factor, and authenticity–authorship anxiety also significantly inhibits RSU. GenAI literacy mainly functions as a boundary condition. High RSU is most likely to emerge from configurations characterised by high perceived authenticity and low digital aesthetic fatigue. Originality/value This study distinguishes RSU from general continuance intention and develops a unified framework integrating authenticity judgment, digital aesthetic fatigue, authenticity–authorship anxiety and perceived classroom digital fairness. It extends S–O–R by showing that long-term AIGC use in art education depends not only on technological perceptions, but also on authenticity confirmation, aesthetic sustainability and classroom governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education + Training
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/et-05-2026-0609
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Responsible and sustainable use of AIGC image tools in art education: an SEM–ANN–fsQCA study

Yuhao Su, Buling Xia, Yugui Luo
Education + Training
AI in Service Interactions
article

Responsible and sustainable use of AIGC image tools in art education: an SEM–ANN–fsQCA study

Yuhao Su, Buling Xia, Yugui Luo
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study examines how responsible and sustainable use intention (RSU) toward artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) image tools is formed in higher education art and design classrooms. Existing research has mainly explained generative AI use through technology acceptance or continuance logic, while paying limited attention to the aesthetic, authenticity-related and classroom-governance conditions under which long-term use becomes norm-compliant and educationally sustainable. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on the stimuli, organismic states and response (S–O–R) framework, this study models perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and perceived classroom digital fairness as stimuli; digital aesthetic fatigue, authenticity–authorship anxiety and perceived authenticity of AIGC images as organismic states; and RSU as the response. GenAI literacy is included as a moderator. Data from 1,238 higher education art and design students were analysed using PLS-SEM, ANN and fsQCA. Findings Classroom use of AIGC image tools is better understood as a responsible post-adoption process than as a general technology acceptance issue. Perceived authenticity is the strongest positive predictor of RSU, digital aesthetic fatigue is the strongest negative factor, and authenticity–authorship anxiety also significantly inhibits RSU. GenAI literacy mainly functions as a boundary condition. High RSU is most likely to emerge from configurations characterised by high perceived authenticity and low digital aesthetic fatigue. Originality/value This study distinguishes RSU from general continuance intention and develops a unified framework integrating authenticity judgment, digital aesthetic fatigue, authenticity–authorship anxiety and perceived classroom digital fairness. It extends S–O–R by showing that long-term AIGC use in art education depends not only on technological perceptions, but also on authenticity confirmation, aesthetic sustainability and classroom governance.

Education + Training
Henan University (CN), Wuhan University of Technology (CN), Hanyang University (KR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.