Intra-session reliability of the Imagined Timed Up and Go Test: intra- and simultaneous inter-rater analyses in community-dwelling older adults

Background Increased Estimation error (EE), the discrepancy between motor imagery and actual physical function, is reportedly a fall-related risk factor. The reliability of the Imagined Timed Up and Go Test (ITUG) for community-dwelling older adults remains unclear, warranting quantitative assessment before broad clinical use.Purpose We aimed to evaluate the ITUG’s intra-session intra-rater and inter-rater reliability.Methods Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and ITUG were performed in older adults with normal cognitive function. EE was defined as ITUG−TUG and Delta time (%) as (TUG−ITUG)/TUG × 100; negative EE and positive Delta time both indicate overestimation of physical ability. Intra-rater reliability was evaluated using repeated within-session measurements and inter-rater reliability using simultaneous timing of the same performance by two examiners within one same-day session. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were evaluated by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) using a two-way mixed-effects, absolute-agreement, single-measures model for intra-rater reliability (ICCA,1) and two-way random-effects, absolute-agreement model for inter-rater reliability, reported as average-measures (ICC2,2) and single-measures (ICC2,1). Bland–Altman 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and the minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC95) were calculated.Results Eighty-five older adults (mean age [standard deviation], 76.1 [5.4] years; 86% women) were included after 13 of 98 recruited participants were excluded. Participants tended to overestimate their physical abilities (TUG: 6.0 [0.9] s; ITUG: 4.0 [1.4] s). Intra-rater reliability was moderate (ICCA,1, 0.69–0.73); simultaneous inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC2,2 ≈ 0.994; ICC2,1, 0.982–0.984). Intra-rater MDC95 (2.3 s; 35.1%) exceeded inter-rater values (0.3 s; 4.9%), indicating within-session variability. Intra-rater 95% LoA were −2.65 to 1.85 s (EE) and −28.2% to 39.7% (Delta time); inter-rater LoA were −0.47 to 0.39 s and −5.8% to 7.6%.Conclusion ITUG-derived EE shows moderate same-day intra-rater repeatability and excellent simultaneous inter-rater agreement, supporting further study of its clinical applicability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2026.2737280
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Intra-session reliability of the Imagined Timed Up and Go Test: intra- and simultaneous inter-rater analyses in community-dwelling older adults

Kazuaki Uda, Teruaki Koshiba, Taisei Inamura, Rintaro Kawabata et al.
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

Intra-session reliability of the Imagined Timed Up and Go Test: intra- and simultaneous inter-rater analyses in community-dwelling older adults

Kazuaki Uda, Teruaki Koshiba, Taisei Inamura, Rintaro Kawabata, Yoshinobu Kobayashi
article en

Abstract

Background Increased Estimation error (EE), the discrepancy between motor imagery and actual physical function, is reportedly a fall-related risk factor. The reliability of the Imagined Timed Up and Go Test (ITUG) for community-dwelling older adults remains unclear, warranting quantitative assessment before broad clinical use.Purpose We aimed to evaluate the ITUG’s intra-session intra-rater and inter-rater reliability.Methods Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and ITUG were performed in older adults with normal cognitive function. EE was defined as ITUG−TUG and Delta time (%) as (TUG−ITUG)/TUG × 100; negative EE and positive Delta time both indicate overestimation of physical ability. Intra-rater reliability was evaluated using repeated within-session measurements and inter-rater reliability using simultaneous timing of the same performance by two examiners within one same-day session. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were evaluated by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) using a two-way mixed-effects, absolute-agreement, single-measures model for intra-rater reliability (ICCA,1) and two-way random-effects, absolute-agreement model for inter-rater reliability, reported as average-measures (ICC2,2) and single-measures (ICC2,1). Bland–Altman 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and the minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC95) were calculated.Results Eighty-five older adults (mean age [standard deviation], 76.1 [5.4] years; 86% women) were included after 13 of 98 recruited participants were excluded. Participants tended to overestimate their physical abilities (TUG: 6.0 [0.9] s; ITUG: 4.0 [1.4] s). Intra-rater reliability was moderate (ICCA,1, 0.69–0.73); simultaneous inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC2,2 ≈ 0.994; ICC2,1, 0.982–0.984). Intra-rater MDC95 (2.3 s; 35.1%) exceeded inter-rater values (0.3 s; 4.9%), indicating within-session variability. Intra-rater 95% LoA were −2.65 to 1.85 s (EE) and −28.2% to 39.7% (Delta time); inter-rater LoA were −0.47 to 0.39 s and −5.8% to 7.6%.Conclusion ITUG-derived EE shows moderate same-day intra-rater repeatability and excellent simultaneous inter-rater agreement, supporting further study of its clinical applicability.

Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
University of Tsukuba (JP), Kio University (JP), Kameda Medical Center (JP), National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sport Psychology and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.