Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis: Clinical and Economic Impacts on Surgical Site Infection Prevention and Healthcare System Sustainability

Background: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is a cornerstone of surgical site infection (SSI) prevention and represents one of the most cost-effective interventions in perioperative care. However, inappropriate antimicrobial selection, timing, dosing, and duration remain common, compromising clinical outcomes and increasing healthcare costs. This narrative review summarizes the clinical and economic impacts of SAP and its role in antimicrobial stewardship, value-based healthcare, and healthcare sustainability. Methods: A narrative review was conducted to synthesize current evidence on the clinical and economic impacts of SAP. The literature addressing the burden of SSIs, the clinical and economic impacts of prophylactic strategies, antimicrobial selection and duration, stewardship interventions, and future perspectives for optimizing perioperative infection prevention was reviewed. Results: Available evidence indicates that appropriate SAP reduces SSI-related morbidity and healthcare resource utilization, whereas inappropriate prophylaxis and prolonged antimicrobial exposure increase costs without improving outcomes. In a Brazilian microcosting study, deep sternal wound infection increased hospitalization costs by 152%, and mediastinitis by 188%, compared with uninfected patients. In orthopedic surgery, actual prophylaxis costs were approximately 11-fold higher than guideline-based regimens when inappropriate prescribing predominated. In neurosurgery, prolonged prophylaxis increased antimicrobial costs from US$3.35 to US$20.41 per patient, despite similar SSI rates (3.5% vs. 3.6%). Stewardship interventions have also demonstrated substantial economic benefits; one arthroplasty program improved optimal prophylactic antimicrobial selection from 64.9% to 95.4% and generated estimated savings of US$197,050 per 1000 procedures. Conclusions: Appropriate SAP is a high-value intervention that improves patient outcomes while reducing healthcare costs. Optimizing antimicrobial selection, timing, dosing, and duration through stewardship initiatives is essential to maximize clinical effectiveness, minimize unnecessary antimicrobial exposure, and promote sustainable healthcare systems. Future studies should incorporate standardized pharmacoeconomic methodologies to strengthen evidence-based decision-making and value-based surgical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infectious Disease Reports
Published
2026-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/idr18050109
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis: Clinical and Economic Impacts on Surgical Site Infection Prevention and Healthcare System Sustainability

Letícia Ramos Dantas, Marta Francisca de Fátima Fragoso, Aline da Silva Paula, Felipe Francisco Tuon et al.
Infectious Disease Reports
Surgical site infection prevention
article

Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis: Clinical and Economic Impacts on Surgical Site Infection Prevention and Healthcare System Sustainability

Letícia Ramos Dantas, Marta Francisca de Fátima Fragoso, Aline da Silva Paula, Felipe Francisco Tuon, Jorge Rufino Ribas Timi
article en

Abstract

Background: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is a cornerstone of surgical site infection (SSI) prevention and represents one of the most cost-effective interventions in perioperative care. However, inappropriate antimicrobial selection, timing, dosing, and duration remain common, compromising clinical outcomes and increasing healthcare costs. This narrative review summarizes the clinical and economic impacts of SAP and its role in antimicrobial stewardship, value-based healthcare, and healthcare sustainability. Methods: A narrative review was conducted to synthesize current evidence on the clinical and economic impacts of SAP. The literature addressing the burden of SSIs, the clinical and economic impacts of prophylactic strategies, antimicrobial selection and duration, stewardship interventions, and future perspectives for optimizing perioperative infection prevention was reviewed. Results: Available evidence indicates that appropriate SAP reduces SSI-related morbidity and healthcare resource utilization, whereas inappropriate prophylaxis and prolonged antimicrobial exposure increase costs without improving outcomes. In a Brazilian microcosting study, deep sternal wound infection increased hospitalization costs by 152%, and mediastinitis by 188%, compared with uninfected patients. In orthopedic surgery, actual prophylaxis costs were approximately 11-fold higher than guideline-based regimens when inappropriate prescribing predominated. In neurosurgery, prolonged prophylaxis increased antimicrobial costs from US$3.35 to US$20.41 per patient, despite similar SSI rates (3.5% vs. 3.6%). Stewardship interventions have also demonstrated substantial economic benefits; one arthroplasty program improved optimal prophylactic antimicrobial selection from 64.9% to 95.4% and generated estimated savings of US$197,050 per 1000 procedures. Conclusions: Appropriate SAP is a high-value intervention that improves patient outcomes while reducing healthcare costs. Optimizing antimicrobial selection, timing, dosing, and duration through stewardship initiatives is essential to maximize clinical effectiveness, minimize unnecessary antimicrobial exposure, and promote sustainable healthcare systems. Future studies should incorporate standardized pharmacoeconomic methodologies to strengthen evidence-based decision-making and value-based surgical care.

Infectious Disease ReportsVol. 18(5)
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (BR), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.