Building and construction in preschool – between policy classification and children’s learning

Abstract This article explores the positioning of building and construction activities in Swedish preschool authoritative documents from the 1950s and onwards. Drawing on the concept of classification, the study analyses how these activities have shifted from being situated within the practical-aesthetic domain – closely linked to crafts and creative expression – to becoming increasingly embedded within, first the science domain, and later the technological one. The analysis reveals a recontextualisation, where building and construction activities have retained cross-disciplinary characteristics while gradually being framed as part of preschool technology education. While this shift can be understood as a strengthening of technology as a curriculum area, previous research highlights that construction activities function best as open, process‑oriented practices, where learning emerges through play, exploration, and didactical support. This creates a tension between policy‑level reclassification and the pedagogical conditions that support children’s learning, participation, and meaning‑making in building and construction activities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-026-10127-1
Primary Topic
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Building and construction in preschool – between policy classification and children’s learning

Johan Boström
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
article

Building and construction in preschool – between policy classification and children’s learning

Johan Boström
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the positioning of building and construction activities in Swedish preschool authoritative documents from the 1950s and onwards. Drawing on the concept of classification, the study analyses how these activities have shifted from being situated within the practical-aesthetic domain – closely linked to crafts and creative expression – to becoming increasingly embedded within, first the science domain, and later the technological one. The analysis reveals a recontextualisation, where building and construction activities have retained cross-disciplinary characteristics while gradually being framed as part of preschool technology education. While this shift can be understood as a strengthening of technology as a curriculum area, previous research highlights that construction activities function best as open, process‑oriented practices, where learning emerges through play, exploration, and didactical support. This creates a tension between policy‑level reclassification and the pedagogical conditions that support children’s learning, participation, and meaning‑making in building and construction activities.

International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.