Health Care Merger Enforcement in the 2020s: Policy Changes and Enforcement Continuity

We evaluate U.S. merger enforcement in the 2020s with a focus on health care merger enforcement under the Biden Administration and the surrounding Trump Administrations. Although federal policymakers across administrations have signaled shifts in enforcement intensity and approach in public statements, when it comes to actual merger challenges in the health care sector, enforcement has been largely consistent. For example, hospital merger challenges have occurred at similar rates dating back to the early 2010s, and have relied on consistent, traditional theories of competitive harm. Enforcement actions in other health care sectors, such as physician services and home health, likewise show continuity, save for a potential shift toward resolving more merger challenges with divestiture agreements under the second Trump administration. Meanwhile, a growing number of states are taking a more active enforcement role through expanded merger-notification requirements and independent challenges of health care mergers and acquisitions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Care Research and Review
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587261472541
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Health Care Merger Enforcement in the 2020s: Policy Changes and Enforcement Continuity

Matt Wohlleben, Cory Capps, Leyla Karakas
Medical Care Research and Review
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Health Care Merger Enforcement in the 2020s: Policy Changes and Enforcement Continuity

Matt Wohlleben, Cory Capps, Leyla Karakas
article en

Abstract

We evaluate U.S. merger enforcement in the 2020s with a focus on health care merger enforcement under the Biden Administration and the surrounding Trump Administrations. Although federal policymakers across administrations have signaled shifts in enforcement intensity and approach in public statements, when it comes to actual merger challenges in the health care sector, enforcement has been largely consistent. For example, hospital merger challenges have occurred at similar rates dating back to the early 2010s, and have relied on consistent, traditional theories of competitive harm. Enforcement actions in other health care sectors, such as physician services and home health, likewise show continuity, save for a potential shift toward resolving more merger challenges with divestiture agreements under the second Trump administration. Meanwhile, a growing number of states are taking a more active enforcement role through expanded merger-notification requirements and independent challenges of health care mergers and acquisitions.

Medical Care Research and Review
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Health Care Merger Enforcement in the 2020s: Policy Changes and Enforcement Continuity — Matt Wohlleben, Cory Capps, et al. · Medical Care Research and Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS