Prime Ministers and Political Parties: Is there a Prime Minister in the House?

Abstract Article 43(2)(a) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia states that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall appoint as Prime Minister ‘a member of the House of Representatives who in his judgment is likely to command the confidence of the majority of the members of that House’. Within a span of five years (2018-2022), this power was exercised four times to appoint four different Prime Ministers. This article looks retrospectively at those unprecedented events, and prospectively at how we should navigate future instances of constitutional uncertainty. This article argues that article 49A of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia, which was specifically introduced in 2022 to curb the problem of party-hopping, may turn out to have the exaptational function of providing an unexpected, win-win solution to the matter of discretionary uncertainty. This exaptational lesson signals the potential for a novel use of constitutional tools to effect incremental change in measured doses, as Malaysia transitions from a dominant-party state to a vibrant multi-party democracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Comparative Law
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2026.10036
Primary Topic
Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Prime Ministers and Political Parties: Is there a Prime Minister in the House?

Stephanie Chng, Pui Yee Choong, Joshua Neoh
Asian Journal of Comparative Law
Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
article

Prime Ministers and Political Parties: Is there a Prime Minister in the House?

Stephanie Chng, Pui Yee Choong, Joshua Neoh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Article 43(2)(a) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia states that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall appoint as Prime Minister ‘a member of the House of Representatives who in his judgment is likely to command the confidence of the majority of the members of that House’. Within a span of five years (2018-2022), this power was exercised four times to appoint four different Prime Ministers. This article looks retrospectively at those unprecedented events, and prospectively at how we should navigate future instances of constitutional uncertainty. This article argues that article 49A of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia, which was specifically introduced in 2022 to curb the problem of party-hopping, may turn out to have the exaptational function of providing an unexpected, win-win solution to the matter of discretionary uncertainty. This exaptational lesson signals the potential for a novel use of constitutional tools to effect incremental change in measured doses, as Malaysia transitions from a dominant-party state to a vibrant multi-party democracy.

Asian Journal of Comparative Law
Australian National University (AU), University of Malaya (MY)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.