Immediate changes following a single 7-minute free digital Miracle of Mind meditation: a single-arm feasibility study

Scalable digital strategies that support subjective well-being before the consolidation of psychological distress remain limited. Ultra-brief, mobile-delivered interventions may offer a low-burden, just-in-time approach compatible with everyday digital ecosystems. However, the extent to which a single-session, sub-10-minute digital meditation is associated with immediate changes in self-reported affect remains insufficiently characterized. In a single-arm pre-post feasibility study, 1325 participants completed assessments before and after a publicly available 7-minute guided digital meditation, delivered unmodified through a research application. Affect was measured with the 12-item Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE), administered with standard instructions and two exploratory items. Within-person changes were evaluated using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with rank-biserial correlations and 95% confidence intervals. A baseline adjusted regression (ANCOVA) model predicted post-intervention scores from baseline scores, prior meditation exposure, their interaction, and demographic covariates. Oldham’s method and a comparison of baseline slopes with published test-retest reliability were used to examine regression to mean effect. Medium to large within-person changes were observed across domains. SPANE-Balance demonstrated the largest change ( \(\:{r}_{rb}\) = 0.77, 95% CI [0.73,0.81]), followed by SPANE-Negative ( \(\:{r}_{rb}\) = -0.73, 95% CI [-0.77, -0.68]) and SPANE-Positive ( \(\:{r}_{rb}\) = 0.6, 95% CI [0.54, 0.65]). Negative affect items (e.g., sad, angry) had relatively more change than most positive items. In baseline-adjusted models, post-intervention scores were strongly predicted by baseline scores (β = 0.40–0.50, p < .001), and this relationship did not differ significantly by prior meditation exposure after correction for multiple comparisons. Sensitivity analyses indicated the magnitude of change exceeded what regression to the mean alone could plausibly produce across a range of reliability estimates, suggesting these shifts are unlikely to be fully explained by measurement artifact. A single 7-minute digital meditation session was associated with immediate within-person changes in self-reported affect. The findings support the feasibility of delivering and evaluating sub-10-minute digital interventions at scale and motivate a randomized controlled trial with an active comparator and state-sensitive affect measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05696-8
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Immediate changes following a single 7-minute free digital Miracle of Mind meditation: a single-arm feasibility study

Saketh Malipeddi, Deepthi Rajashekar, Steven Laureys, Kanakavalli Kundury et al.
BMC Psychology
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
article

Immediate changes following a single 7-minute free digital Miracle of Mind meditation: a single-arm feasibility study

Saketh Malipeddi, Deepthi Rajashekar, Steven Laureys, Kanakavalli Kundury, Amit Mehta, Balachundhar Subramaniam, Parveen Sharma, Jyotsna Agrawal, Hemavarne Shankar
article en

Abstract

Scalable digital strategies that support subjective well-being before the consolidation of psychological distress remain limited. Ultra-brief, mobile-delivered interventions may offer a low-burden, just-in-time approach compatible with everyday digital ecosystems. However, the extent to which a single-session, sub-10-minute digital meditation is associated with immediate changes in self-reported affect remains insufficiently characterized. In a single-arm pre-post feasibility study, 1325 participants completed assessments before and after a publicly available 7-minute guided digital meditation, delivered unmodified through a research application. Affect was measured with the 12-item Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE), administered with standard instructions and two exploratory items. Within-person changes were evaluated using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with rank-biserial correlations and 95% confidence intervals. A baseline adjusted regression (ANCOVA) model predicted post-intervention scores from baseline scores, prior meditation exposure, their interaction, and demographic covariates. Oldham’s method and a comparison of baseline slopes with published test-retest reliability were used to examine regression to mean effect. Medium to large within-person changes were observed across domains. SPANE-Balance demonstrated the largest change ( \(\:{r}_{rb}\) = 0.77, 95% CI [0.73,0.81]), followed by SPANE-Negative ( \(\:{r}_{rb}\) = -0.73, 95% CI [-0.77, -0.68]) and SPANE-Positive ( \(\:{r}_{rb}\) = 0.6, 95% CI [0.54, 0.65]). Negative affect items (e.g., sad, angry) had relatively more change than most positive items. In baseline-adjusted models, post-intervention scores were strongly predicted by baseline scores (β = 0.40–0.50, p < .001), and this relationship did not differ significantly by prior meditation exposure after correction for multiple comparisons. Sensitivity analyses indicated the magnitude of change exceeded what regression to the mean alone could plausibly produce across a range of reliability estimates, suggesting these shifts are unlikely to be fully explained by measurement artifact. A single 7-minute digital meditation session was associated with immediate within-person changes in self-reported affect. The findings support the feasibility of delivering and evaluating sub-10-minute digital interventions at scale and motivate a randomized controlled trial with an active comparator and state-sensitive affect measures.

BMC Psychology
JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research (IN), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Swansea University (GB), Université Laval (CA), National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.