Communication of Screen-Positive Newborn Bloodspot Screening Results for Metabolic Conditions in Ireland–Parent and Healthcare Professional Experience: A Service Evaluation

Communication of screen-positive newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) results is inherently challenging for both parents and HCPs. There is no internationally accepted gold-standard model, with heterogeneity in practice and with many jurisdictions reporting suboptimal parent and HCP experience. This service evaluation aimed to assess the model for communication of initial screen positive results for metabolic conditions through the Irish National Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programme (NNBSP). Under the current model, screen-positive results are communicated to parents by a healthcare professional (HCP) (usually over the phone) and follow-up is arranged through the maternity hospital of birth. The evaluation required engagement with three cohorts, comprising two parent cohorts (a True Positive (TP) cohort and a False Positive (FP) cohort) and one HCP cohort. A separate survey was designed for each cohort, informed by a review of the international literature and subject matter expertise. Overall, our evaluation found that the current model for communication of screen-positive results is acceptable to HCPs, the majority of whom regard communicating these results as an appropriate part of their role (61%) and feel confident doing so (68%). However, many parents reported that they did not receive key information, and 70% wanted more information at this first communication. Parents wanted clear, reassuring, and actionable information, including details of the suspected condition, next steps, and where to seek further support. HCPs wanted additional resources to support communication of screen-positive results, including guidelines, expert contacts, condition-specific information resources, and checklists. The findings of this evaluation will inform revisions of the current model, aimed at ensuring a better experience for parents and HCPs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns12040078
Primary Topic
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Communication of Screen-Positive Newborn Bloodspot Screening Results for Metabolic Conditions in Ireland–Parent and Healthcare Professional Experience: A Service Evaluation

Jenny McNulty, Heather E. Burns, Mairéad Bracken-Scally, Caoimhe Howard et al.
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
article

Communication of Screen-Positive Newborn Bloodspot Screening Results for Metabolic Conditions in Ireland–Parent and Healthcare Professional Experience: A Service Evaluation

Jenny McNulty, Heather E. Burns, Mairéad Bracken-Scally, Caoimhe Howard, Ahmad Ardeshir Monavari, Anna O’Loughlin, Abigail Collins, Olivia Walsh
article en

Abstract

Communication of screen-positive newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) results is inherently challenging for both parents and HCPs. There is no internationally accepted gold-standard model, with heterogeneity in practice and with many jurisdictions reporting suboptimal parent and HCP experience. This service evaluation aimed to assess the model for communication of initial screen positive results for metabolic conditions through the Irish National Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programme (NNBSP). Under the current model, screen-positive results are communicated to parents by a healthcare professional (HCP) (usually over the phone) and follow-up is arranged through the maternity hospital of birth. The evaluation required engagement with three cohorts, comprising two parent cohorts (a True Positive (TP) cohort and a False Positive (FP) cohort) and one HCP cohort. A separate survey was designed for each cohort, informed by a review of the international literature and subject matter expertise. Overall, our evaluation found that the current model for communication of screen-positive results is acceptable to HCPs, the majority of whom regard communicating these results as an appropriate part of their role (61%) and feel confident doing so (68%). However, many parents reported that they did not receive key information, and 70% wanted more information at this first communication. Parents wanted clear, reassuring, and actionable information, including details of the suspected condition, next steps, and where to seek further support. HCPs wanted additional resources to support communication of screen-positive results, including guidelines, expert contacts, condition-specific information resources, and checklists. The findings of this evaluation will inform revisions of the current model, aimed at ensuring a better experience for parents and HCPs.

International Journal of Neonatal ScreeningVol. 12(4)
Health Service Executive (IE), National Children’s Research Centre (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.