Assessment of subjective visual vertical using the bucket test in adults with cochlear implants

Abstract Background Although cochlear implant (CI) surgery is generally considered a safe and successful procedure, the anatomical and physiological characteristics of the inner ear may lead to certain adverse effects on the vestibular system. Subjective visual vertical (SVV) reflects the deviation in an individual’s perception of the earth-vertical line, thereby providing information related to otolith-mediated perception of verticality. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a difference in SVV between adults with CI and those without CI using the bucket test. Methods The study was conducted with a total of 60 participants aged between 18 and 30 years, including CI users ( n = 30) and age-matched normal-hearing (NH) individuals ( n = 30). The bucket test was used to assess SVV in all participants. During the test, the bucket was rotated five times clockwise and five times counterclockwise, and the mean value was recorded. For comparisons of quantitative variables between independent groups, the Student’s t-test was used when parametric assumptions were met; otherwise, the Mann–Whitney U test was applied. Results Among all participants, the median age of female participants was 25 (20.75, 28.25) years, whereas the median age of male participants was 23 (21, 30) years. No statistically significant difference was found between males and females in clockwise and counterclockwise bucket test results (Z = − 1.674, p = 0.094; Z = − 0.438, p = 0.661, respectively). Additionally, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups (NH vs. CI) in clockwise and counterclockwise bucket test results (Z = − 0.244, p = 0.807; Z = − 1.158, p = 0.247, respectively). Despite the absence of a statistically significant group-level difference, nine CI users (30.0%) demonstrated a deviation greater than 3° in at least one rotation direction. Conclusions Among the long-term CI users included in this study, no statistically significant differences in SVV deviation were detected compared with NH participants or according to sex and rotation direction. However, because the study was cross-sectional and did not include preoperative or objective ear-specific vestibular assessments, these findings should not be interpreted as evidence of preserved utricular function following cochlear implantation. The Bucket Test may provide a practical bedside measure of SVV, but complementary objective vestibular assessments are required for a comprehensive evaluation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-026-01238-6
Primary Topic
Vestibular and auditory disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Assessment of subjective visual vertical using the bucket test in adults with cochlear implants

Banu Baş, Ismail Cem GULMEZ
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Vestibular and auditory disorders
article

Assessment of subjective visual vertical using the bucket test in adults with cochlear implants

Banu Baş, Ismail Cem GULMEZ
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Although cochlear implant (CI) surgery is generally considered a safe and successful procedure, the anatomical and physiological characteristics of the inner ear may lead to certain adverse effects on the vestibular system. Subjective visual vertical (SVV) reflects the deviation in an individual’s perception of the earth-vertical line, thereby providing information related to otolith-mediated perception of verticality. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a difference in SVV between adults with CI and those without CI using the bucket test. Methods The study was conducted with a total of 60 participants aged between 18 and 30 years, including CI users ( n = 30) and age-matched normal-hearing (NH) individuals ( n = 30). The bucket test was used to assess SVV in all participants. During the test, the bucket was rotated five times clockwise and five times counterclockwise, and the mean value was recorded. For comparisons of quantitative variables between independent groups, the Student’s t-test was used when parametric assumptions were met; otherwise, the Mann–Whitney U test was applied. Results Among all participants, the median age of female participants was 25 (20.75, 28.25) years, whereas the median age of male participants was 23 (21, 30) years. No statistically significant difference was found between males and females in clockwise and counterclockwise bucket test results (Z = − 1.674, p = 0.094; Z = − 0.438, p = 0.661, respectively). Additionally, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups (NH vs. CI) in clockwise and counterclockwise bucket test results (Z = − 0.244, p = 0.807; Z = − 1.158, p = 0.247, respectively). Despite the absence of a statistically significant group-level difference, nine CI users (30.0%) demonstrated a deviation greater than 3° in at least one rotation direction. Conclusions Among the long-term CI users included in this study, no statistically significant differences in SVV deviation were detected compared with NH participants or according to sex and rotation direction. However, because the study was cross-sectional and did not include preoperative or objective ear-specific vestibular assessments, these findings should not be interpreted as evidence of preserved utricular function following cochlear implantation. The Bucket Test may provide a practical bedside measure of SVV, but complementary objective vestibular assessments are required for a comprehensive evaluation.

The Egyptian Journal of OtolaryngologyVol. 42(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Vestibular and auditory disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.