From normative principles to epistemic governance: A workflow-based analysis of European journalism ethics in datafied environments

Data journalism has received limited attention in journalism ethics, where it is often assumed that established normative principles apply directly to data-driven practices. However, data journalism relies on complex data processes that introduce distinct epistemic challenges related to bias, interpretation, and accountability. This study examines data journalism ethics as a form of epistemic governance embedded across key stages of the data journalism workflow, from data gathering to data visualisation, drawing on a thematic analysis of 37 ethical codes from 32 European countries. The findings show that, while ethical codes consistently articulate principles such as accuracy, fairness, and transparency, they rarely operationalise them in relation to methodological decisions shaping data-driven reporting. The epistemic governance framework serves as a bridge between data journalism ethics and AI ethics, as many AI-related ethical challenges originate in data practices and are intensified by automation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849261492006
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

From normative principles to epistemic governance: A workflow-based analysis of European journalism ethics in datafied environments

Laurence Dierickx, Marília Gehrke, Carl-Gustav Lindén
Journalism
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

From normative principles to epistemic governance: A workflow-based analysis of European journalism ethics in datafied environments

Laurence Dierickx, Marília Gehrke, Carl-Gustav Lindén
article en

Abstract

Data journalism has received limited attention in journalism ethics, where it is often assumed that established normative principles apply directly to data-driven practices. However, data journalism relies on complex data processes that introduce distinct epistemic challenges related to bias, interpretation, and accountability. This study examines data journalism ethics as a form of epistemic governance embedded across key stages of the data journalism workflow, from data gathering to data visualisation, drawing on a thematic analysis of 37 ethical codes from 32 European countries. The findings show that, while ethical codes consistently articulate principles such as accuracy, fairness, and transparency, they rarely operationalise them in relation to methodological decisions shaping data-driven reporting. The epistemic governance framework serves as a bridge between data journalism ethics and AI ethics, as many AI-related ethical challenges originate in data practices and are intensified by automation.

Journalism
University of Groningen (NL), University of Bergen (NO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From normative principles to epistemic governance: A workflow-based analysis of European journalism ethics in datafied environments — Laurence Dierickx, Marília Gehrke, et al. · Journalism (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS