Current perspectives on the pharmacologic treatment of boys and adolescents with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism

INTRODUCTION: Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH) in boys and adolescents requires age- and developmentally appropriate treatment to address androgen deficiency, testicular maturation, pubertal development, and ultimately fertility. The dynamic physiology of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis necessitates therapeutic strategies that differ substantially between infancy and adolescence. AREAS COVERED: This review examines current pharmacological approaches to CHH across childhood and adolescence, focusing on testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, gonadotropins, pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), and emerging kisspeptin-based therapies. Literature search was made in Pubmed for the period 1990-2026. EXPERT OPINION: Testosterone remains the standard approach for for inducing secondary sexual characteristics and effectively promotes virilization, growth, bone accrual, and psychosocial well-being, but does not induce testicular maturation or spermatogenesis. Gonadotropin therapy, particularly sequential follicle-stimulating hormone followed by luteinizing hormone or human chorionic gonadotropin, more directly promotes Sertoli-cell maturation, testicular growth, and spermatogenesis. Early gonadotropin treatment in infancy can reproduce several features of physiological mini-puberty, although its long-term reproductive benefits remain uncertain. Pulsatile GnRH is physiologically attractive but limited by availability and treatment complexity, whereas kisspeptin remains investigational. Treatment should be individualized according to developmental stage, testicular phenotype, therapeutic goals, anticipated fertility, treatment burden, and patient preferences. Major unmet needs include pediatric-specific formulations, optimized regimens, comparative trials, biomarkers of treatment response, and long-term reproductive outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
Published
2026-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2026.2741490
Primary Topic
Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Current perspectives on the pharmacologic treatment of boys and adolescents with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism

Romina P. Grinspon, Rodolfo Alberto Rey
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
article

Current perspectives on the pharmacologic treatment of boys and adolescents with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism

Romina P. Grinspon, Rodolfo Alberto Rey
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH) in boys and adolescents requires age- and developmentally appropriate treatment to address androgen deficiency, testicular maturation, pubertal development, and ultimately fertility. The dynamic physiology of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis necessitates therapeutic strategies that differ substantially between infancy and adolescence. AREAS COVERED: This review examines current pharmacological approaches to CHH across childhood and adolescence, focusing on testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, gonadotropins, pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), and emerging kisspeptin-based therapies. Literature search was made in Pubmed for the period 1990-2026. EXPERT OPINION: Testosterone remains the standard approach for for inducing secondary sexual characteristics and effectively promotes virilization, growth, bone accrual, and psychosocial well-being, but does not induce testicular maturation or spermatogenesis. Gonadotropin therapy, particularly sequential follicle-stimulating hormone followed by luteinizing hormone or human chorionic gonadotropin, more directly promotes Sertoli-cell maturation, testicular growth, and spermatogenesis. Early gonadotropin treatment in infancy can reproduce several features of physiological mini-puberty, although its long-term reproductive benefits remain uncertain. Pulsatile GnRH is physiologically attractive but limited by availability and treatment complexity, whereas kisspeptin remains investigational. Treatment should be individualized according to developmental stage, testicular phenotype, therapeutic goals, anticipated fertility, treatment burden, and patient preferences. Major unmet needs include pediatric-specific formulations, optimized regimens, comparative trials, biomarkers of treatment response, and long-term reproductive outcomes.

Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
Hospital General de Niños Ricardo Gutierrez (AR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.