Here comes the flood: crisis learning and public support for EU disaster solidarity

This article investigates how satisfaction with the EU’s past crisis management shapes support for EU-level risk-sharing in response to natural disasters, termed ‘disaster solidarity’. Drawing on original cross-country public opinion survey data and a natural experiment conducted during severe flooding, the study distinguishes between inter-crises learning (based on prior experiences) and intra-crisis learning (triggered by an ongoing crisis). Findings reveal that satisfaction with the EU’s performance during the COVID-19 pandemic – a crisis managed with visible supranational coordination – is positively associated with support for disaster solidarity. The refugee and Euro Area crises have no such positive learning effect, suggesting that inter-crises learning depends on the respective policy responses adopted in the past. By contrast, intra-crisis learning reduces support for EU-level risk-sharing and weakens the influence of inter-crises learning. Overall, our results highlight the conditional nature of public support for supranational risk-sharing and the limits of inter-crisis learning under acute threat.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
West European Politics
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2026.2730209
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Here comes the flood: crisis learning and public support for EU disaster solidarity

Ann‐Kathrin Reinl, Alessandro Pellegata
West European Politics
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Here comes the flood: crisis learning and public support for EU disaster solidarity

Ann‐Kathrin Reinl, Alessandro Pellegata
article en

Abstract

This article investigates how satisfaction with the EU’s past crisis management shapes support for EU-level risk-sharing in response to natural disasters, termed ‘disaster solidarity’. Drawing on original cross-country public opinion survey data and a natural experiment conducted during severe flooding, the study distinguishes between inter-crises learning (based on prior experiences) and intra-crisis learning (triggered by an ongoing crisis). Findings reveal that satisfaction with the EU’s performance during the COVID-19 pandemic – a crisis managed with visible supranational coordination – is positively associated with support for disaster solidarity. The refugee and Euro Area crises have no such positive learning effect, suggesting that inter-crises learning depends on the respective policy responses adopted in the past. By contrast, intra-crisis learning reduces support for EU-level risk-sharing and weakens the influence of inter-crises learning. Overall, our results highlight the conditional nature of public support for supranational risk-sharing and the limits of inter-crisis learning under acute threat.

West European Politics
University of Milan (IT), GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Here comes the flood: crisis learning and public support for EU disaster solidarity — Ann‐Kathrin Reinl, Alessandro Pellegata · West European Politics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS