Revisiting Eden: Rethinking the Eden Narrative in Conservation Scholarship

For decades, conservation scholarship has problematised the ‘Edenic’ narrative invoked within early British discourses of nature and practices of conservation. Specifically, scholars have suggested that colonial conceptions of ‘wilderness’ as a veritable ‘Garden of Eden’, especially in places such as Eastern and Southern Africa, helped to legitimize the ideological and physical separation of nature and people, in part leading to the creation of the first conservation areas and subsequent socio-political impacts. This article does not contest that assertion. However, this article does seek to make three contributions. First, we suggest that while colonial conceptions of Christianity are integral to the formation of early conservation mechanisms, the use of Edenic language by both British colonists, and subsequently in the critical conservation-related literature, is problematic. Second, despite the abundance of conservation-related literature engaging with the concept of Eden, a theological analysis is lacking. Thus, we seek to provide an interpretation of Eden based on an exegesis of chapters one and two of the Book of Genesis in dialogue with other relevant Biblical passages. Third, based on this exegesis, we suggest how our interpretation of Eden can inform the future of conservation theory and practice by positing some characteristics of an Edenic conservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2026-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17101128
Primary Topic
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Revisiting Eden: Rethinking the Eden Narrative in Conservation Scholarship

Dave Bookless, Peter Rowe
Religions
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
article

Revisiting Eden: Rethinking the Eden Narrative in Conservation Scholarship

Dave Bookless, Peter Rowe
article en

Abstract

For decades, conservation scholarship has problematised the ‘Edenic’ narrative invoked within early British discourses of nature and practices of conservation. Specifically, scholars have suggested that colonial conceptions of ‘wilderness’ as a veritable ‘Garden of Eden’, especially in places such as Eastern and Southern Africa, helped to legitimize the ideological and physical separation of nature and people, in part leading to the creation of the first conservation areas and subsequent socio-political impacts. This article does not contest that assertion. However, this article does seek to make three contributions. First, we suggest that while colonial conceptions of Christianity are integral to the formation of early conservation mechanisms, the use of Edenic language by both British colonists, and subsequently in the critical conservation-related literature, is problematic. Second, despite the abundance of conservation-related literature engaging with the concept of Eden, a theological analysis is lacking. Thus, we seek to provide an interpretation of Eden based on an exegesis of chapters one and two of the Book of Genesis in dialogue with other relevant Biblical passages. Third, based on this exegesis, we suggest how our interpretation of Eden can inform the future of conservation theory and practice by positing some characteristics of an Edenic conservation.

ReligionsVol. 17(10)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.