Between support and uncertainty: employers’ perspectives on workplace inclusion of people with mental health problems

Abstract Background Despite increasing awareness of mental health in the workplace, people with mental health problems continue to face substantial barriers to labour market participation. While stigma-related explanations have been widely addressed, less is known about how employers respond to mental health problems within the constraints of everyday organisational practice. This study explores employers’ perspectives on workplace inclusion, with a particular focus on ambivalences, facilitating orientations, and expectations towards employees with mental health problems. Methods This study reports findings from the first, qualitative phase of a participatory mixed-methods research project conducted in Southern Germany. Between November 2022 and August 2023, we conducted 29 semi-structured interviews with employers from companies across different sectors. Data were analysed using structured qualitative content analysis. Results Employers described ambivalent orientations towards the inclusion of people with mental health problems. While mental health issues were seen as increasingly normalised and framed within broader societal developments, employers reported uncertainties regarding work organisation, team functioning, and predictability. Facilitating orientations included social responsibility, recognition of the health-promoting role of employment, pragmatic responses to labour shortages, and positive prior experiences. At the same time, workplace participation was often described as depending on employees’ transparency regarding work-related limitations, individual responsibility for managing mental health, and disclosure as a prerequisite for employers’ support and mutual trust. Discussion Workplace inclusion of people with mental health problems appears to depend not only on employers’ attitudes but also on practical considerations related to work organization and team functioning. Employers’ perspectives reflected ambivalence, balancing commitments to participation with concerns about predictability, fairness, and collective functioning. Expectations regarding disclosure, responsibility, and transparency were central to perceived feasibility of support. Conclusions Addressing these organisational dynamics may help inform more context-sensitive strategies to promote sustainable labour market participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15665-x
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Between support and uncertainty: employers’ perspectives on workplace inclusion of people with mental health problems

Lea Mayer, Reinhold Kilian, Nicole Stasch, Silvia Krumm et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Between support and uncertainty: employers’ perspectives on workplace inclusion of people with mental health problems

Lea Mayer, Reinhold Kilian, Nicole Stasch, Silvia Krumm, Christiane Braun-Volkert, Sarah Feige, Edith Almer, Lena Renz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite increasing awareness of mental health in the workplace, people with mental health problems continue to face substantial barriers to labour market participation. While stigma-related explanations have been widely addressed, less is known about how employers respond to mental health problems within the constraints of everyday organisational practice. This study explores employers’ perspectives on workplace inclusion, with a particular focus on ambivalences, facilitating orientations, and expectations towards employees with mental health problems. Methods This study reports findings from the first, qualitative phase of a participatory mixed-methods research project conducted in Southern Germany. Between November 2022 and August 2023, we conducted 29 semi-structured interviews with employers from companies across different sectors. Data were analysed using structured qualitative content analysis. Results Employers described ambivalent orientations towards the inclusion of people with mental health problems. While mental health issues were seen as increasingly normalised and framed within broader societal developments, employers reported uncertainties regarding work organisation, team functioning, and predictability. Facilitating orientations included social responsibility, recognition of the health-promoting role of employment, pragmatic responses to labour shortages, and positive prior experiences. At the same time, workplace participation was often described as depending on employees’ transparency regarding work-related limitations, individual responsibility for managing mental health, and disclosure as a prerequisite for employers’ support and mutual trust. Discussion Workplace inclusion of people with mental health problems appears to depend not only on employers’ attitudes but also on practical considerations related to work organization and team functioning. Employers’ perspectives reflected ambivalence, balancing commitments to participation with concerns about predictability, fairness, and collective functioning. Expectations regarding disclosure, responsibility, and transparency were central to perceived feasibility of support. Conclusions Addressing these organisational dynamics may help inform more context-sensitive strategies to promote sustainable labour market participation.

BMC Health Services Research
Universität Ulm (DE), University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.