Cotton rotation with single and multispecies cover crops affects yield, quality, and economic outcomes

Abstract Cover crops (CCs) have gained popularity in continuous crop production systems due to their agroecosystem benefits. This study evaluated the effects of nine CC treatments (single or multispecies) and no cover crop (noCC) on cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) growth characteristics, production, and economic returns in the Mid‐South United States. The CC treatments were set up in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Significant differences were found for CC biomass accumulation, with cereal rye ( Secale cereale L; 3915 kg ha −1 ) and cereal rye + crimson clover ( Trifolium incarnatum L.) mix (3845 kg ha −1 ) producing the highest biomass among all the treatments. Total nitrogen (TN) accumulation in aboveground biomass was highest for hairy vetch ( Vicia villosa Roth) + radish ( Raphanus sativus L.) mix, which was significantly higher than hairy vetch or crimson clover monocultures, when averaged across years. The noCC consistently produced lower biomass and TN accumulation than all other treatments. When data were averaged over years, seed cotton yield was lowest in cotton rotated with cereal rye (2394 kg ha −1 ) and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L; 2484 kg ha −1 ). Cotton lint yield was 216–234 kg ha −1 lower with cereal rye and wheat than noCC. Cotton fiber fineness (micronaire) was lowest for cotton rotated with wheat CC. Averaged over the years, CC reduced the expected net returns compared to the noCC. Overall economic analysis showed that among CC cotton rotations, multispecies CC offered greater profitability and yield‐based risk‐adjusted returns than single‐species CCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70458
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Cotton rotation with single and multispecies cover crops affects yield, quality, and economic outcomes

Gurpreet Kaur, Mehtab Muhammad Aslam, Kelly A. Nelson, Gurbir Singh et al.
Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
article

Cotton rotation with single and multispecies cover crops affects yield, quality, and economic outcomes

Gurpreet Kaur, Mehtab Muhammad Aslam, Kelly A. Nelson, Gurbir Singh, Pranay Kumar Kadari
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cover crops (CCs) have gained popularity in continuous crop production systems due to their agroecosystem benefits. This study evaluated the effects of nine CC treatments (single or multispecies) and no cover crop (noCC) on cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) growth characteristics, production, and economic returns in the Mid‐South United States. The CC treatments were set up in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Significant differences were found for CC biomass accumulation, with cereal rye ( Secale cereale L; 3915 kg ha −1 ) and cereal rye + crimson clover ( Trifolium incarnatum L.) mix (3845 kg ha −1 ) producing the highest biomass among all the treatments. Total nitrogen (TN) accumulation in aboveground biomass was highest for hairy vetch ( Vicia villosa Roth) + radish ( Raphanus sativus L.) mix, which was significantly higher than hairy vetch or crimson clover monocultures, when averaged across years. The noCC consistently produced lower biomass and TN accumulation than all other treatments. When data were averaged over years, seed cotton yield was lowest in cotton rotated with cereal rye (2394 kg ha −1 ) and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L; 2484 kg ha −1 ). Cotton lint yield was 216–234 kg ha −1 lower with cereal rye and wheat than noCC. Cotton fiber fineness (micronaire) was lowest for cotton rotated with wheat CC. Averaged over the years, CC reduced the expected net returns compared to the noCC. Overall economic analysis showed that among CC cotton rotations, multispecies CC offered greater profitability and yield‐based risk‐adjusted returns than single‐species CCs.

Agrosystems Geosciences & EnvironmentVol. 9(4)
Missouri College (US), University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.