The acceptability of and adherence to a high-dose walking booster program after stroke (HiWalk): a multi-method study of stroke survivors’ experiences nested within a randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate the acceptability of a high-dose walking booster program for community-dwelling stroke survivors by examining adherence and identifying barriers and facilitators to participation. The program was a short duration, high-dose motor training program for walking, delivered up to three hours daily over three weeks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-method study was conducted parallel to a Phase II randomised trial (HiWalk). Adherence to the program was measured using attendance and repetition counts. Nineteen participants from the experimental group were interviewed using a schedule informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). Interviews were thematically analysed to interpret acceptability of the program. RESULTS: Participants attended 91% (SD 13) of sessions and averaged 567 repetitions per hour (SD 171). Qualitative data indicated program acceptability, with participants recommending the program to peers. Participants reported facilitators for the high-dose walking booster program included the opportunity to attend (Intervention Coherence), strong motivation (Affective Attitude) and support networks (Burden). Barriers described included fatigue (Burden) and competing life responsibilities (Opportunity Cost). CONCLUSIONS: HiWalk was acceptable to stroke survivors, supported by high adherence to the program. Despite barriers including fatigue and managing life responsibilities, participants were motivated to attend HiWalk and felt it was worthwhile. Implications for RehabilitationStroke survivors demonstrated high levels of adherence to a high-dose, short duration walking booster program.Stroke survivors expressed a strong desire to address walking related goals and viewed a high-dose walking booster program as an opportunity to work on these goals.Stroke survivors reported that support of therapists, family and carers helped them participate in the program.Some of the barriers to the high-dose walking booster program were addressed by the therapists tailoring the program to stroke survivor physical ability and fatigue levels.Advanced scheduling of the high-dose walking booster program allowed stroke survivors to manage the time commitment of the program with life roles and responsibilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2737734
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The acceptability of and adherence to a high-dose walking booster program after stroke (HiWalk): a multi-method study of stroke survivors’ experiences nested within a randomised controlled trial

Lauren Christie, Joanne Valentina Glinsky, Sharon Kramer, Catherine Mary Dean et al.
Disability and Rehabilitation
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

The acceptability of and adherence to a high-dose walking booster program after stroke (HiWalk): a multi-method study of stroke survivors’ experiences nested within a randomised controlled trial

Lauren Christie, Joanne Valentina Glinsky, Sharon Kramer, Catherine Mary Dean, Natasha Anne Lannin, Katharine Scrivener, Avanthi Elisha Ball
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the acceptability of a high-dose walking booster program for community-dwelling stroke survivors by examining adherence and identifying barriers and facilitators to participation. The program was a short duration, high-dose motor training program for walking, delivered up to three hours daily over three weeks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-method study was conducted parallel to a Phase II randomised trial (HiWalk). Adherence to the program was measured using attendance and repetition counts. Nineteen participants from the experimental group were interviewed using a schedule informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). Interviews were thematically analysed to interpret acceptability of the program. RESULTS: Participants attended 91% (SD 13) of sessions and averaged 567 repetitions per hour (SD 171). Qualitative data indicated program acceptability, with participants recommending the program to peers. Participants reported facilitators for the high-dose walking booster program included the opportunity to attend (Intervention Coherence), strong motivation (Affective Attitude) and support networks (Burden). Barriers described included fatigue (Burden) and competing life responsibilities (Opportunity Cost). CONCLUSIONS: HiWalk was acceptable to stroke survivors, supported by high adherence to the program. Despite barriers including fatigue and managing life responsibilities, participants were motivated to attend HiWalk and felt it was worthwhile. Implications for RehabilitationStroke survivors demonstrated high levels of adherence to a high-dose, short duration walking booster program.Stroke survivors expressed a strong desire to address walking related goals and viewed a high-dose walking booster program as an opportunity to work on these goals.Stroke survivors reported that support of therapists, family and carers helped them participate in the program.Some of the barriers to the high-dose walking booster program were addressed by the therapists tailoring the program to stroke survivor physical ability and fatigue levels.Advanced scheduling of the high-dose walking booster program allowed stroke survivors to manage the time commitment of the program with life roles and responsibilities.

Disability and Rehabilitation
The University of Sydney (AU), St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU), St Vincent's Health (AU), Alfred Health (AU), Nursing Research Institute (AU), Monash University (AU), Australian Catholic University (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.