Gender-specific associations between polygenic scores and age-specific risk of psychiatric disorders

Background Polygenic scores (PGS) have been used to quantify genetic liability for psychiatric disorders, but it remains unclear how these scores are associated with age- and gender-specific risk of diagnosis. Aims To examine associations between disorder-specific PGS and age- and gender-specific risk of psychiatric diagnoses across major psychiatric disorders. Method We conducted a population-based case–cohort study using the Danish iPSYCH2015 sample, including individuals born in Denmark between 1981 and 2008 and followed for psychiatric diagnoses from 1994 to 2015. Cases comprised individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD; N = 30 905), schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SCZ; N = 12 703), bipolar disorder ( N = 3169), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder ( N = 25 167) or autism spectrum disorder (ASD; N = 15 677), alongside a randomly sampled subcohort ( N = 52 765). Disorder-specific PGS were the exposures. Gender- and age-specific hazard ratios for first hospital-based diagnoses were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results All PGS were associated with risk of all disorders regardless of age. For MDD, the highest association per 1 s.d. increase in PGS was observed at ages 17–19 (males: hazard ratio 1.56; 95% CI 1.45–1.69; females: hazard ratio 1.48; 95% CI 1.40–1.57). SCZ-PGS showed marked gender differences, with the strongest association with SCZ diagnosis at ages 20–22 years for males (hazard ratio 1.71; 95% CI 1.54–1.90) and 17–19 years for females (hazard ratio 1.29; 95% CI 1.16–1.44). ASD–PGS associations were strongest in males at ages 4–6 (hazard ratio 1.51; 95% CI 1.44–1.61) and 7–9 years (hazard ratio 1.55; 95% CI 1.47–1.65), and in females at ages 13–15 years (hazard ratio 1.60; 95% CI 1.41–1.82). Gender differences were evident across disorders. The PGS–schizophrenia association was stronger in males, whereas for childhood-onset disorders, associations were stronger in females but emerged at older ages. Conclusions Polygenic burden for psychiatric disorders tends to be more strongly associated with risk of diagnosis at younger ages, with gender-specific patterns. Future genetic research should consider both age at diagnosis and potential gender differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2026.10759
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Gender-specific associations between polygenic scores and age-specific risk of psychiatric disorders

Danni Chen, Bárbara Arias, Esben Agerbo, Bjarni Jóhann Vilhjálmsson et al.
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
article

Gender-specific associations between polygenic scores and age-specific risk of psychiatric disorders

Danni Chen, Bárbara Arias, Esben Agerbo, Bjarni Jóhann Vilhjálmsson, Liselotte Vogdrup Petersen, Oleguer Plana‐Ripoll, Genona Torruella Maseras, Clara Albiñana, Katherine L. Musliner
article en

Abstract

Background Polygenic scores (PGS) have been used to quantify genetic liability for psychiatric disorders, but it remains unclear how these scores are associated with age- and gender-specific risk of diagnosis. Aims To examine associations between disorder-specific PGS and age- and gender-specific risk of psychiatric diagnoses across major psychiatric disorders. Method We conducted a population-based case–cohort study using the Danish iPSYCH2015 sample, including individuals born in Denmark between 1981 and 2008 and followed for psychiatric diagnoses from 1994 to 2015. Cases comprised individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD; N = 30 905), schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SCZ; N = 12 703), bipolar disorder ( N = 3169), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder ( N = 25 167) or autism spectrum disorder (ASD; N = 15 677), alongside a randomly sampled subcohort ( N = 52 765). Disorder-specific PGS were the exposures. Gender- and age-specific hazard ratios for first hospital-based diagnoses were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results All PGS were associated with risk of all disorders regardless of age. For MDD, the highest association per 1 s.d. increase in PGS was observed at ages 17–19 (males: hazard ratio 1.56; 95% CI 1.45–1.69; females: hazard ratio 1.48; 95% CI 1.40–1.57). SCZ-PGS showed marked gender differences, with the strongest association with SCZ diagnosis at ages 20–22 years for males (hazard ratio 1.71; 95% CI 1.54–1.90) and 17–19 years for females (hazard ratio 1.29; 95% CI 1.16–1.44). ASD–PGS associations were strongest in males at ages 4–6 (hazard ratio 1.51; 95% CI 1.44–1.61) and 7–9 years (hazard ratio 1.55; 95% CI 1.47–1.65), and in females at ages 13–15 years (hazard ratio 1.60; 95% CI 1.41–1.82). Gender differences were evident across disorders. The PGS–schizophrenia association was stronger in males, whereas for childhood-onset disorders, associations were stronger in females but emerged at older ages. Conclusions Polygenic burden for psychiatric disorders tends to be more strongly associated with risk of diagnosis at younger ages, with gender-specific patterns. Future genetic research should consider both age at diagnosis and potential gender differences.

The British Journal of Psychiatry
Broad Institute (US), Aarhus University (DK), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), University of Oxford (GB), Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.