Well-Being Measurement in Africa: A Systematic Review

The general narrative in well-being measurement is a lack of representation of instruments developed and validated in the African context. However, there is no existing review solely focused on Africa that clearly demonstrates the extent of progress in the field and the current methodological challenges. The present study aims to systematically review and collate evidence on the validation of well-being measures in Africa. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method, a total of 64 research articles were reviewed. The study’s findings showed steady growth in well-being measurement in the African context. However, this growth has not been without challenges that are stifling our general understanding and consensus on how well-being should be measured in Africa. A persistent research gap is the development of new, contextually relevant measures of well-being. Among the recurring methodological challenges were translation issues, poor model fit indices and the use of small samples. We recommend further testing of locally developed well-being measures and their incorporation into international surveys, as cross-country assessments can only yield meaningful insights when the items used adequately capture local experiences. Translation of existing measures is key in accessing hard-to-reach populations, with such data informing clinical and community-based interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16101772
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Well-Being Measurement in Africa: A Systematic Review

Marié Philipina Wissing, Angelina Wilson Fadiji, Nnana Samuel Uchendu
Behavioral Sciences
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
article

Well-Being Measurement in Africa: A Systematic Review

Marié Philipina Wissing, Angelina Wilson Fadiji, Nnana Samuel Uchendu
article en

Abstract

The general narrative in well-being measurement is a lack of representation of instruments developed and validated in the African context. However, there is no existing review solely focused on Africa that clearly demonstrates the extent of progress in the field and the current methodological challenges. The present study aims to systematically review and collate evidence on the validation of well-being measures in Africa. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method, a total of 64 research articles were reviewed. The study’s findings showed steady growth in well-being measurement in the African context. However, this growth has not been without challenges that are stifling our general understanding and consensus on how well-being should be measured in Africa. A persistent research gap is the development of new, contextually relevant measures of well-being. Among the recurring methodological challenges were translation issues, poor model fit indices and the use of small samples. We recommend further testing of locally developed well-being measures and their incorporation into international surveys, as cross-country assessments can only yield meaningful insights when the items used adequately capture local experiences. Translation of existing measures is key in accessing hard-to-reach populations, with such data informing clinical and community-based interventions.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(10)
North-West University (ZA), De Montfort University (GB), University of Pretoria (ZA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Well-Being Measurement in Africa: A Systematic Review — Marié Philipina Wissing, Angelina Wilson Fadiji, et al. · Behavioral Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS