A Pilot Study Investigating Implicit and Explicit Attitudes toward People with Disabilities among Orthotics and Prosthetics Educators

Background: Negative attitudes toward people with disabilities (PWD) persist in healthcare, contributing to poorer outcomes, widening disparities, and reduced quality of care. The orthotics and prosthetics (O&P) profession sits at the intersection of disability and functional independence, with clinicians working closely with PWD to promote mobility and improve daily functioning. Yet, the presence of disability-related attitudes within O&P remains largely unexplored. Objectives: The objective of this pilot study was to quantify the explicit and implicit attitudes toward PWD among O&P educators. As an exploratory objective, this study examined whether educator characteristics were associated with levels of implicit and explicit attitudes. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: An online survey was performed with educators at credentialed U.S. O&P graduate programs. Participants completed demographic questions, the Symbolic Ableism Scale to assess explicit attitudes, and the Disability Attitudes-Implicit Association Test to measure implicit attitudes. Data were analyzed using one-sample t -tests and regression models to examine associations between demographic variables and attitude scores. Results: A total of 25 individuals completed the survey. Explicit attitude scores (mean = 0.33, SD = 0.12) indicated a moderate preference for people without disabilities (PWoD), which was significantly different from no preference ( P < 0.001). Implicit attitude scores (mean = 0.44, SD = 0.40) reflected a moderate preference for PWoD, which was significantly different from no preference ( P < 0.001). Men demonstrated greater preferences for PWoD than women ( P < 0.05). Conclusions: Findings reveal explicit and implicit attitudes favoring PWoD among O&P educators, emphasizing the need for interventions to foster inclusive educational environments within O&P graduate programs. Clinical Relevance Statement: Disability attitudes among O&P educators may influence health equity and future clinicians’ perspectives. This study’s finding of moderate preferences for PWoD highlights the need to evaluate the resources and curricular content currently used in O&P education to address these biases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jpo.0000000000000662
Primary Topic
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Pilot Study Investigating Implicit and Explicit Attitudes toward People with Disabilities among Orthotics and Prosthetics Educators

Kiley Armstrong, Roberto López-Rosado, Steven Gard, Michael Cavanaugh et al.
JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
article

A Pilot Study Investigating Implicit and Explicit Attitudes toward People with Disabilities among Orthotics and Prosthetics Educators

Kiley Armstrong, Roberto López-Rosado, Steven Gard, Michael Cavanaugh, Gloria Lee, Whitney Doyle, Cody McDonald
article en

Abstract

Background: Negative attitudes toward people with disabilities (PWD) persist in healthcare, contributing to poorer outcomes, widening disparities, and reduced quality of care. The orthotics and prosthetics (O&P) profession sits at the intersection of disability and functional independence, with clinicians working closely with PWD to promote mobility and improve daily functioning. Yet, the presence of disability-related attitudes within O&P remains largely unexplored. Objectives: The objective of this pilot study was to quantify the explicit and implicit attitudes toward PWD among O&P educators. As an exploratory objective, this study examined whether educator characteristics were associated with levels of implicit and explicit attitudes. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: An online survey was performed with educators at credentialed U.S. O&P graduate programs. Participants completed demographic questions, the Symbolic Ableism Scale to assess explicit attitudes, and the Disability Attitudes-Implicit Association Test to measure implicit attitudes. Data were analyzed using one-sample t -tests and regression models to examine associations between demographic variables and attitude scores. Results: A total of 25 individuals completed the survey. Explicit attitude scores (mean = 0.33, SD = 0.12) indicated a moderate preference for people without disabilities (PWoD), which was significantly different from no preference ( P < 0.001). Implicit attitude scores (mean = 0.44, SD = 0.40) reflected a moderate preference for PWoD, which was significantly different from no preference ( P < 0.001). Men demonstrated greater preferences for PWoD than women ( P < 0.05). Conclusions: Findings reveal explicit and implicit attitudes favoring PWoD among O&P educators, emphasizing the need for interventions to foster inclusive educational environments within O&P graduate programs. Clinical Relevance Statement: Disability attitudes among O&P educators may influence health equity and future clinicians’ perspectives. This study’s finding of moderate preferences for PWoD highlights the need to evaluate the resources and curricular content currently used in O&P education to address these biases.

JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Northwestern University (US), United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US), University of Washington (US), Amputee Coalition of America (US), Jesse Brown VA Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.