Scheduling the Charging of Battery-Electric Vehicles Under Heterogeneous Scheduling Constraints

Adopting battery electric vehicles (EVs) for vehicle fleets requires scheduling charging alongside day-to-day operations. This problem is complicated by complex utility cost structures, limited battery capacity, and competition for shared charging resources. Existing methods that simultaneously schedule routes and charging neither address the full cost structure nor employ high-fidelity charging models, and no prior work analyzes fleets containing vehicles with heterogeneous routing constraints. This work addresses these gaps by combining a state-of-the-art flexible-schedule formulation with time-of-use (TOU) demand costs and a non-linear, variable-rate charging model as drawn from additional state-of-the-art works. The proposed method is validated against two state-of-the-art methods, achieving cost reductions of 89% and 24%, respectively. An analysis across fleet compositions that mix fixed-schedule and flexible-schedule vehicles reveals a trade-off between cost and computational complexity, with a 50/50 split providing the best balance for the scenarios considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Transportation
Published
2026-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp6050209
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Scheduling the Charging of Battery-Electric Vehicles Under Heterogeneous Scheduling Constraints

Justin Whitaker, Greg N. Droge, Mario Harper
Future Transportation
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
article

Scheduling the Charging of Battery-Electric Vehicles Under Heterogeneous Scheduling Constraints

Justin Whitaker, Greg N. Droge, Mario Harper
article en

Abstract

Adopting battery electric vehicles (EVs) for vehicle fleets requires scheduling charging alongside day-to-day operations. This problem is complicated by complex utility cost structures, limited battery capacity, and competition for shared charging resources. Existing methods that simultaneously schedule routes and charging neither address the full cost structure nor employ high-fidelity charging models, and no prior work analyzes fleets containing vehicles with heterogeneous routing constraints. This work addresses these gaps by combining a state-of-the-art flexible-schedule formulation with time-of-use (TOU) demand costs and a non-linear, variable-rate charging model as drawn from additional state-of-the-art works. The proposed method is validated against two state-of-the-art methods, achieving cost reductions of 89% and 24%, respectively. An analysis across fleet compositions that mix fixed-schedule and flexible-schedule vehicles reveals a trade-off between cost and computational complexity, with a 50/50 split providing the best balance for the scenarios considered.

Future TransportationVol. 6(5)
Utah State University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.