Diagnostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for identifying severe great saphenous vein reflux in patients with chronic venous insufficiency: A retrospective cohort study

Objectives The role of inflammatory markers in chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) has been examined primarily within the CEAP clinical classification framework or at a disease-present versus disease-absent level. CEAP, however, is weighted toward symptoms and skin findings and does not directly reflect the underlying hemodynamic severity of reflux. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and optimal cutoff values of five preoperative inflammatory markers in differentiating severe (Grade IV; reflux time ≥4 s) from moderate (Grade III; reflux time >1 to <4 s) great saphenous vein reflux through direct pairwise comparison. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort study enrolled 597 consecutive patients (Grade III: 412; Grade IV: 185) operated on for CVI. White blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet count (PLT), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were analyzed with group comparisons, Benjamini-Hochberg–adjusted correlation analysis, multivariable linear regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with DeLong pairwise testing. Results All five markers were significantly elevated in the Grade IV group ( p < 0.001 for each). NLR achieved the highest discriminative performance (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.95; cutoff ≥2.20; sensitivity 83.8%; specificity 90.3%) and was significantly superior to all other markers, including CRP, on DeLong testing ( p < 0.001). Performance was preserved after excluding patients with ulceration (C5–C6; AUC: 0.96). NLR also exhibited the strongest correlations with reflux duration (ρ = 0.57) and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS; ρ = 0.54). In the multivariable model, NLR was the strongest independent predictor of VCSS (B = 3.54; 95% confidence interval: 2.99–4.09; adjusted R 2 = 0.416). Conclusions NLR — calculable from a routine complete blood count at no additional cost — distinguished severe great saphenous vein reflux with high accuracy and may serve as an accessible adjunctive marker for preoperative severity assessment. Prospective multicenter validation is warranted.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555261490785
Primary Topic
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Diagnostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for identifying severe great saphenous vein reflux in patients with chronic venous insufficiency: A retrospective cohort study

Tamer Cebe, Anıl Akbaş, Gökhan Karakoç, Kübra Gözaçık Karakoç
Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
article

Diagnostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for identifying severe great saphenous vein reflux in patients with chronic venous insufficiency: A retrospective cohort study

Tamer Cebe, Anıl Akbaş, Gökhan Karakoç, Kübra Gözaçık Karakoç
article en

Abstract

Objectives The role of inflammatory markers in chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) has been examined primarily within the CEAP clinical classification framework or at a disease-present versus disease-absent level. CEAP, however, is weighted toward symptoms and skin findings and does not directly reflect the underlying hemodynamic severity of reflux. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and optimal cutoff values of five preoperative inflammatory markers in differentiating severe (Grade IV; reflux time ≥4 s) from moderate (Grade III; reflux time >1 to <4 s) great saphenous vein reflux through direct pairwise comparison. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort study enrolled 597 consecutive patients (Grade III: 412; Grade IV: 185) operated on for CVI. White blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet count (PLT), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were analyzed with group comparisons, Benjamini-Hochberg–adjusted correlation analysis, multivariable linear regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with DeLong pairwise testing. Results All five markers were significantly elevated in the Grade IV group ( p < 0.001 for each). NLR achieved the highest discriminative performance (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.95; cutoff ≥2.20; sensitivity 83.8%; specificity 90.3%) and was significantly superior to all other markers, including CRP, on DeLong testing ( p < 0.001). Performance was preserved after excluding patients with ulceration (C5–C6; AUC: 0.96). NLR also exhibited the strongest correlations with reflux duration (ρ = 0.57) and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS; ρ = 0.54). In the multivariable model, NLR was the strongest independent predictor of VCSS (B = 3.54; 95% confidence interval: 2.99–4.09; adjusted R 2 = 0.416). Conclusions NLR — calculable from a routine complete blood count at no additional cost — distinguished severe great saphenous vein reflux with high accuracy and may serve as an accessible adjunctive marker for preoperative severity assessment. Prospective multicenter validation is warranted.

Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.