The effects of universal parental support programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background There are few current comprehensive meta-analyses and systematic reviews of the literature on universal parental support programs. The aim of this meta-analysis was therefore to examine the effects of universal parental support programs on children’s externalizing and internalizing problems, as well as on parental mental health, and to evaluate the possible importance of theoretical frameworks in achieving better outcomes. Methods The meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials of universal parental support programs for parents to children and adolescents aged 2–17 years. A search in five databases was conducted from inception to December 2020 and updated in April 2024. The abstracts and subsequent full-text articles were independently reviewed by two pairs of authors, resulting in 31 original studies (36 articles) with a total of 7635 participants. To evaluate risk of bias, we used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Results Small positive short-term effects were obtained for the included universal parental support programs on parental ratings of children’s externalizing ( d = 0.18: 95% CI 0.07–0.29) and internalizing problems ( d = 0.16: 95% CI 0.03–0.30), parental stress ( d = 0.22: 95% CI 0.04–0.40) and parental depression ( d = 0.13: 95% CI 0.01–0.25). Subgroup analyses showed that significant effects on primary outcomes were only found when interventions were compared to waitlist, not to an active control group. The long-term between-group effects were positive but small and non-significant. Most of the programs were based on social learning theory, no differences emerged between programs with different theoretical frameworks. Conclusion This meta-analysis indicates that universal parental support programs, when compared to waitlist only, may have a small positive impact on children’s externalizing and internalizing problems as well as on parental stress and depression in the short time frame.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28844-6
Primary Topic
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The effects of universal parental support programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Linus Haglund, Pia Enebrink, Lars-Göran Öst, Agneta Herlitz et al.
BMC Public Health
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
article

The effects of universal parental support programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Linus Haglund, Pia Enebrink, Lars-Göran Öst, Agneta Herlitz, Carl Lovén
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background There are few current comprehensive meta-analyses and systematic reviews of the literature on universal parental support programs. The aim of this meta-analysis was therefore to examine the effects of universal parental support programs on children’s externalizing and internalizing problems, as well as on parental mental health, and to evaluate the possible importance of theoretical frameworks in achieving better outcomes. Methods The meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials of universal parental support programs for parents to children and adolescents aged 2–17 years. A search in five databases was conducted from inception to December 2020 and updated in April 2024. The abstracts and subsequent full-text articles were independently reviewed by two pairs of authors, resulting in 31 original studies (36 articles) with a total of 7635 participants. To evaluate risk of bias, we used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Results Small positive short-term effects were obtained for the included universal parental support programs on parental ratings of children’s externalizing ( d = 0.18: 95% CI 0.07–0.29) and internalizing problems ( d = 0.16: 95% CI 0.03–0.30), parental stress ( d = 0.22: 95% CI 0.04–0.40) and parental depression ( d = 0.13: 95% CI 0.01–0.25). Subgroup analyses showed that significant effects on primary outcomes were only found when interventions were compared to waitlist, not to an active control group. The long-term between-group effects were positive but small and non-significant. Most of the programs were based on social learning theory, no differences emerged between programs with different theoretical frameworks. Conclusion This meta-analysis indicates that universal parental support programs, when compared to waitlist only, may have a small positive impact on children’s externalizing and internalizing problems as well as on parental stress and depression in the short time frame.

BMC Public Health
Stockholm University (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.