The Colonization of Possibility: Recursive Evaluation, the Structural Loss of Sufficiency, and the Institutionalization of Existential Freedom

Human existence is ontologically open, characterized by a structural "not-yet" wherein the self continuallyprojects toward future possibilities rather than resting in a predetermined essence (Heidegger, 1927). Whilethis plasticity is the historical condition of self-formation, late modernity has captured it through a novelinstitutional architecture. This thesis argues that ordinary human development conceptually transitions intoopen-ended self-optimization at a critical structural threshold: when institutionalized developmentalaccountability becomes recursive and achievement systematically ceases to establish definitive sufficiency.Extending the philosophical and sociological frameworks of Heidegger, Taylor, Durkheim, and Han, theresearch demonstrates how the erasure of conclusive endpoints conditions achievement so that it no longerprovides existential closure, but merely resets the operational baseline for renewed exertion (Han, 2015).Rejecting deterministic accounts of universal burnout, this thesis introduces the "responsibility-control gap" asa conceptual mechanism to help theoretically explain why identical evaluative regimes produce divergentoutcomes. Modern subjects are increasingly assigned absolute responsibility for their developmentaltrajectories while being structurally deprived of effective control over the volatile conditions dictating theirsuccess (Bauman, 2000; Beck, 1992). To navigate this contradiction, the thesis establishes an analyticaltripartite matrix separating institutional, agentic, and existential success. Moving from structural diagnosis toexistential reclamation, it concludes that surviving late modernity requires the deliberate restoration of thesubject's authority to establish sufficiency within particular projects and forms of life, anchoring identitywithin an evaluative horizon of significance independent of revisable institutional metrics (Taylor, 1989).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23018300
Primary Topic
Critical Realism in Sociology
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

The Colonization of Possibility: Recursive Evaluation, the Structural Loss of Sufficiency, and the Institutionalization of Existential Freedom

Abhishek Dwivedi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Critical Realism in Sociology
preprint

The Colonization of Possibility: Recursive Evaluation, the Structural Loss of Sufficiency, and the Institutionalization of Existential Freedom

Abhishek Dwivedi
preprint en

Abstract

Human existence is ontologically open, characterized by a structural "not-yet" wherein the self continuallyprojects toward future possibilities rather than resting in a predetermined essence (Heidegger, 1927). Whilethis plasticity is the historical condition of self-formation, late modernity has captured it through a novelinstitutional architecture. This thesis argues that ordinary human development conceptually transitions intoopen-ended self-optimization at a critical structural threshold: when institutionalized developmentalaccountability becomes recursive and achievement systematically ceases to establish definitive sufficiency.Extending the philosophical and sociological frameworks of Heidegger, Taylor, Durkheim, and Han, theresearch demonstrates how the erasure of conclusive endpoints conditions achievement so that it no longerprovides existential closure, but merely resets the operational baseline for renewed exertion (Han, 2015).Rejecting deterministic accounts of universal burnout, this thesis introduces the "responsibility-control gap" asa conceptual mechanism to help theoretically explain why identical evaluative regimes produce divergentoutcomes. Modern subjects are increasingly assigned absolute responsibility for their developmentaltrajectories while being structurally deprived of effective control over the volatile conditions dictating theirsuccess (Bauman, 2000; Beck, 1992). To navigate this contradiction, the thesis establishes an analyticaltripartite matrix separating institutional, agentic, and existential success. Moving from structural diagnosis toexistential reclamation, it concludes that surviving late modernity requires the deliberate restoration of thesubject's authority to establish sufficiency within particular projects and forms of life, anchoring identitywithin an evaluative horizon of significance independent of revisable institutional metrics (Taylor, 1989).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Critical Realism in Sociology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Colonization of Possibility: Recursive Evaluation, the Structural Loss of Sufficiency, and the Institutionalization of Existential Freedom — Abhishek Dwivedi · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS