Moral Flocking: How Shared Moral Foundations Shape the Social Network among First-Semester University Students

Inferences about moral character are central to impression formation, yet how shared moral values relate to offline tie formation remains largely untested. In this preregistered, full-roster study of a German first-semester psychology cohort (N = 112 of 331, 33.84% coverage), we mapped the social ties the cohort formed. Moral foundation similarity was associated with tie formation and held across three further analyses, but the association was small and of the same magnitude as similarity in agreeableness, an established predictor of social ties. The preregistered models for foundation-specific homophily did not converge; in a reduced model, only Authority showed an effect, and the binding and individualizing foundations did not differ in average moral homophily. Centrality and brokerage were unrelated to students' moral foundation endorsements, whereas network communities differed in theirs. Moral homophily is thus detectable where offline networks first form; yet whether it organizes them needs denser, repeated observation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology Archives
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.22534
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

Moral Flocking: How Shared Moral Foundations Shape the Social Network among First-Semester University Students

Sarah Marie Müller, Frederic R. Hopp, Nico Sebastian Musa
Psychology Archives
Social and Intergroup Psychology
preprint

Moral Flocking: How Shared Moral Foundations Shape the Social Network among First-Semester University Students

Sarah Marie Müller, Frederic R. Hopp, Nico Sebastian Musa
preprint en

Abstract

Inferences about moral character are central to impression formation, yet how shared moral values relate to offline tie formation remains largely untested. In this preregistered, full-roster study of a German first-semester psychology cohort (N = 112 of 331, 33.84% coverage), we mapped the social ties the cohort formed. Moral foundation similarity was associated with tie formation and held across three further analyses, but the association was small and of the same magnitude as similarity in agreeableness, an established predictor of social ties. The preregistered models for foundation-specific homophily did not converge; in a reduced model, only Authority showed an effect, and the binding and individualizing foundations did not differ in average moral homophily. Centrality and brokerage were unrelated to students' moral foundation endorsements, whereas network communities differed in theirs. Moral homophily is thus detectable where offline networks first form; yet whether it organizes them needs denser, repeated observation.

Psychology Archives
Reduced inequalities
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.