BTSCON 2026 - Lightning Talk - Publishing, Incentives, and Conflict: An Action Research Inquiry

Slides for a lightning talk at the fifth annual Big Team Science Conference (BTSCON 2026), held virtually via Zoom, 6 to 8 October 2026. Academic publishing functions both as a marker of scientific contribution and as a key mechanism for career advancement. This dual role raises a normative question. Should structural incentives to publish be considered conflicts of interest that require disclosure? The Psychology of Science Hub addresses this question through an action research approach that includes a community-wide survey: https://erasmusuniversity.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_2c5MCHQLkgFlvQa.The goal of the survey is to map diverse perspectives on what counts as a conflict of interest in publishing and how such interests should be handled. In this lightning talk, we will present preliminary findings from the survey, focusing on disciplinary and regional differences in perceptions of conflicts of interest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23019891
Primary Topic
Academic Publishing and Open Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

BTSCON 2026 - Lightning Talk - Publishing, Incentives, and Conflict: An Action Research Inquiry

Hannes Schatzle
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Academic Publishing and Open Access
article

BTSCON 2026 - Lightning Talk - Publishing, Incentives, and Conflict: An Action Research Inquiry

Hannes Schatzle
article en

Abstract

Slides for a lightning talk at the fifth annual Big Team Science Conference (BTSCON 2026), held virtually via Zoom, 6 to 8 October 2026. Academic publishing functions both as a marker of scientific contribution and as a key mechanism for career advancement. This dual role raises a normative question. Should structural incentives to publish be considered conflicts of interest that require disclosure? The Psychology of Science Hub addresses this question through an action research approach that includes a community-wide survey: https://erasmusuniversity.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_2c5MCHQLkgFlvQa.The goal of the survey is to map diverse perspectives on what counts as a conflict of interest in publishing and how such interests should be handled. In this lightning talk, we will present preliminary findings from the survey, focusing on disciplinary and regional differences in perceptions of conflicts of interest.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Academic Publishing and Open Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.