Real-World Validation of an AI-Based Opportunistic Osteoporosis Risk Stratification Tool Using Chest Radiographs in a Male-Predominant Cohort

Background: Osteoporosis is a major public health concern and a leading cause of fragility fractures, yet screening with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains limited by accessibility and utilization. Opportunistic artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis of routinely acquired chest radiographs (CXRs) may facilitate osteoporosis risk stratification. This study aimed to independently validate a regulatory-approved deep learning model (VeriOsteo™ OP) in a real-world, male-predominant cohort. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2336 patients who underwent both CXR and DXA at a medical center in 2023, including 1688 males (72.3%) and 648 females (27.7%). Osteoporosis was defined as a DXA T-score ≤ −2.5. AI performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with sex-specific subgroup analyses. Results: The AI model achieved an accuracy of 76.97%, sensitivity of 69.67%, specificity of 84.64%, PPV of 82.66%, and NPV of 72.65%. The overall AUC was 0.854 (95% CI, 0.839–0.868). The AUC was 0.825 (95% CI, 0.794–0.854) in males and 0.849 (95% CI, 0.831–0.866) in females. PPV was lower in males than in females (60.00% vs. 83.39%), while other performance measures were broadly comparable. The optimal AI cutoff also differed between males (≤−1.9) and females (≤−2.5). Conclusions: The AI model demonstrated good discrimination for opportunistic osteoporosis risk stratification using CXRs in a real-world cohort. Its moderate sensitivity and lower PPV among males highlight potential sex-related differences in AI-assisted osteoporosis assessment. The model may be most appropriately used as an adjunctive risk-stratification and DXA-prioritization tool to identify individuals who may benefit from subsequent DXA evaluation rather than a standalone diagnostic test.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14193200
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Real-World Validation of an AI-Based Opportunistic Osteoporosis Risk Stratification Tool Using Chest Radiographs in a Male-Predominant Cohort

Han-Ting Shih, Chia‐Hsien Hsu, Kao‐Chang Tu, Cheng-Hung Lee et al.
Healthcare
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Real-World Validation of an AI-Based Opportunistic Osteoporosis Risk Stratification Tool Using Chest Radiographs in a Male-Predominant Cohort

Han-Ting Shih, Chia‐Hsien Hsu, Kao‐Chang Tu, Cheng-Hung Lee, Kun-Hui Chen, Sheng-Chou Wu
article en

Abstract

Background: Osteoporosis is a major public health concern and a leading cause of fragility fractures, yet screening with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains limited by accessibility and utilization. Opportunistic artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis of routinely acquired chest radiographs (CXRs) may facilitate osteoporosis risk stratification. This study aimed to independently validate a regulatory-approved deep learning model (VeriOsteo™ OP) in a real-world, male-predominant cohort. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2336 patients who underwent both CXR and DXA at a medical center in 2023, including 1688 males (72.3%) and 648 females (27.7%). Osteoporosis was defined as a DXA T-score ≤ −2.5. AI performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with sex-specific subgroup analyses. Results: The AI model achieved an accuracy of 76.97%, sensitivity of 69.67%, specificity of 84.64%, PPV of 82.66%, and NPV of 72.65%. The overall AUC was 0.854 (95% CI, 0.839–0.868). The AUC was 0.825 (95% CI, 0.794–0.854) in males and 0.849 (95% CI, 0.831–0.866) in females. PPV was lower in males than in females (60.00% vs. 83.39%), while other performance measures were broadly comparable. The optimal AI cutoff also differed between males (≤−1.9) and females (≤−2.5). Conclusions: The AI model demonstrated good discrimination for opportunistic osteoporosis risk stratification using CXRs in a real-world cohort. Its moderate sensitivity and lower PPV among males highlight potential sex-related differences in AI-assisted osteoporosis assessment. The model may be most appropriately used as an adjunctive risk-stratification and DXA-prioritization tool to identify individuals who may benefit from subsequent DXA evaluation rather than a standalone diagnostic test.

HealthcareVol. 14(19)
National Chung Hsing University (TW), National Health Research Institutes (TW), Tunghai University (TW), Providence University (TW), National Tsing Hua University (TW), Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TW)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.