Anatomic Features Associated with Operative Strategy in Minimally Invasive Gastric GIST Resection: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Operative decision-making in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) surgery is strongly influenced by tumor anatomy. Although surgeons routinely consider anatomic features such as proximity to the gastroesophageal junction, posterior wall location, and endophytic growth during operative planning, their combined association with operative strategy has not been systematically evaluated. Methods: We evaluated whether commonly recognized anatomic features of gastric GISTs were associated with operative strategy in a contemporary minimally invasive surgical cohort. Tumors were characterized according to the presence of three predefined anatomic features: proximal location near the gastroesophageal junction, posterior wall involvement, and endophytic growth pattern. Cases were grouped as lower (0–1 features) or higher (2–3 features) complexity. The primary outcome was operative strategy, categorized as simple (wedge resection or enucleation) or complex (partial gastrectomy or transgastric resection). Associations between anatomic complexity and operative approach were evaluated. Results: A total of 83 patients were included, with 50 (60.2%) classified as lower complexity and 33 (39.8%) as higher complexity. Operative strategy varied significantly by complexity group. Tumors in the higher complexity group were more frequently managed with complex operative techniques, including partial gastrectomy and transgastric resection ( P = .002). This association remained significant after adjustment for tumor size (odds ratio 2.87, 95% CI: 1.12–7.65, P = .031). A graded relationship was observed, with increasing use of complex techniques as the number of anatomical features increased. The robotic platform was used more frequently in higher complexity cases ( P = .03). Perioperative outcomes were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Recognized anatomical features of gastric GISTs were associated with operative strategy and reflected real-world surgical decision-making. Systematically describing these features may facilitate preoperative assessment and improve consistency in reporting operative approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261491045
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Anatomic Features Associated with Operative Strategy in Minimally Invasive Gastric GIST Resection: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Enrique Fernando Elli, Tamar Tsenteradze, Steven P. Bowers
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
article

Anatomic Features Associated with Operative Strategy in Minimally Invasive Gastric GIST Resection: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Enrique Fernando Elli, Tamar Tsenteradze, Steven P. Bowers
article en

Abstract

Background: Operative decision-making in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) surgery is strongly influenced by tumor anatomy. Although surgeons routinely consider anatomic features such as proximity to the gastroesophageal junction, posterior wall location, and endophytic growth during operative planning, their combined association with operative strategy has not been systematically evaluated. Methods: We evaluated whether commonly recognized anatomic features of gastric GISTs were associated with operative strategy in a contemporary minimally invasive surgical cohort. Tumors were characterized according to the presence of three predefined anatomic features: proximal location near the gastroesophageal junction, posterior wall involvement, and endophytic growth pattern. Cases were grouped as lower (0–1 features) or higher (2–3 features) complexity. The primary outcome was operative strategy, categorized as simple (wedge resection or enucleation) or complex (partial gastrectomy or transgastric resection). Associations between anatomic complexity and operative approach were evaluated. Results: A total of 83 patients were included, with 50 (60.2%) classified as lower complexity and 33 (39.8%) as higher complexity. Operative strategy varied significantly by complexity group. Tumors in the higher complexity group were more frequently managed with complex operative techniques, including partial gastrectomy and transgastric resection ( P = .002). This association remained significant after adjustment for tumor size (odds ratio 2.87, 95% CI: 1.12–7.65, P = .031). A graded relationship was observed, with increasing use of complex techniques as the number of anatomical features increased. The robotic platform was used more frequently in higher complexity cases ( P = .03). Perioperative outcomes were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Recognized anatomical features of gastric GISTs were associated with operative strategy and reflected real-world surgical decision-making. Systematically describing these features may facilitate preoperative assessment and improve consistency in reporting operative approaches.

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.