A risk-based framework for regional decarbonization: spatial analysis of household sector vulnerabilities and resilience pathways

Climate change acts as a risk multiplier, increasing disaster hazards worldwide. This study assesses the regional decarbonization of Russia’s Housing and Communal Services (HCS) sector through the lens of disaster risk reduction (DRR), using the IPCC AR6 hazard-exposure-vulnerability framework. We evaluate household carbon footprints in seven Russian federal districts and Arctic regions ( n = 400) to uncover spatial disparity in emission drivers and socio-economic vulnerabilities that shape climate risk profiles. Our methodology combines survey data with region-specific emission factors, cost-benefit analysis, and Monte Carlo simulations (10,000 iterations) to assess policy options for both reducing emissions and enhancing disaster risk reduction benefits. Moscow’s per capita emissions (1,034 kg CO₂eq/month) are twice those of Vladimir (512 kg), largely due to aviation (24%) and automobile use (45%). Siberian regions like Tomsk show high vulnerability from coal dependence (60% of emissions) and energy poverty (18% of income spent on energy). Policy simulations suggest that region-specific interventions, such as aviation fees in Moscow (Benefit-Cost Ratio: 4.8) and transitioning from coal to gas in Tomsk (BCR: 3.0), are more cost-effective and provide substantial risk reduction benefits, including better air quality (30–50% reduction in PM2.5), improved energy security, and decreased vulnerability to price shocks. Monte Carlo projections show contrasting paths for 2030: Moscow faces a potential 35% increase in emissions under worst-case scenarios, while Tomsk may achieve a 24% reduction with successful fuel switching. This study presents a repeatable framework for creating climate policies that address disaster risk drivers while improving socio-ecological resilience in large and diverse nations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Disaster Science and Management
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44367-026-00048-0
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A risk-based framework for regional decarbonization: spatial analysis of household sector vulnerabilities and resilience pathways

Solomon Ekene Okeke, Yuri Pavlovich Khitev
Journal of Disaster Science and Management
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
article

A risk-based framework for regional decarbonization: spatial analysis of household sector vulnerabilities and resilience pathways

Solomon Ekene Okeke, Yuri Pavlovich Khitev
article en

Abstract

Climate change acts as a risk multiplier, increasing disaster hazards worldwide. This study assesses the regional decarbonization of Russia’s Housing and Communal Services (HCS) sector through the lens of disaster risk reduction (DRR), using the IPCC AR6 hazard-exposure-vulnerability framework. We evaluate household carbon footprints in seven Russian federal districts and Arctic regions ( n = 400) to uncover spatial disparity in emission drivers and socio-economic vulnerabilities that shape climate risk profiles. Our methodology combines survey data with region-specific emission factors, cost-benefit analysis, and Monte Carlo simulations (10,000 iterations) to assess policy options for both reducing emissions and enhancing disaster risk reduction benefits. Moscow’s per capita emissions (1,034 kg CO₂eq/month) are twice those of Vladimir (512 kg), largely due to aviation (24%) and automobile use (45%). Siberian regions like Tomsk show high vulnerability from coal dependence (60% of emissions) and energy poverty (18% of income spent on energy). Policy simulations suggest that region-specific interventions, such as aviation fees in Moscow (Benefit-Cost Ratio: 4.8) and transitioning from coal to gas in Tomsk (BCR: 3.0), are more cost-effective and provide substantial risk reduction benefits, including better air quality (30–50% reduction in PM2.5), improved energy security, and decreased vulnerability to price shocks. Monte Carlo projections show contrasting paths for 2030: Moscow faces a potential 35% increase in emissions under worst-case scenarios, while Tomsk may achieve a 24% reduction with successful fuel switching. This study presents a repeatable framework for creating climate policies that address disaster risk drivers while improving socio-ecological resilience in large and diverse nations.

Journal of Disaster Science and ManagementVol. 2(1)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.