Benchmarking Paper Recommendation Systems: What Does It Mean to Prove That They Work?

This seminar paper was prepared for “Bachelor/Master Seminar – Current/Hot Topics in Applied AI, Business Process Management, and Blockchain” at the Technical University of Munich during Summer Semester 2026. It reviews how paper recommendation, citation recommendation, and literature discovery systems are evaluated. Drawing on 39 studies from 2020–2026, it examines evaluation choices such as candidate pools, relevance labels, baselines, metrics, and evidence from users or deployments. It proposes a checklist for matching evaluation evidence to claims about a system’s practical usefulness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23020094
Primary Topic
Expert finding and Q&A systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Benchmarking Paper Recommendation Systems: What Does It Mean to Prove That They Work?

Ömer Ozan Mart
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Expert finding and Q&A systems
article

Benchmarking Paper Recommendation Systems: What Does It Mean to Prove That They Work?

Ömer Ozan Mart
article en

Abstract

This seminar paper was prepared for “Bachelor/Master Seminar – Current/Hot Topics in Applied AI, Business Process Management, and Blockchain” at the Technical University of Munich during Summer Semester 2026. It reviews how paper recommendation, citation recommendation, and literature discovery systems are evaluated. Drawing on 39 studies from 2020–2026, it examines evaluation choices such as candidate pools, relevance labels, baselines, metrics, and evidence from users or deployments. It proposes a checklist for matching evaluation evidence to claims about a system’s practical usefulness.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Expert finding and Q&A systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.