Implementing generative artificial intelligence in a tertiary hospital health screening center

Abstract Health screening centers perform high-volume, repetitive, information-intensive tasks that may be well suited to generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), but safe implementation requires accuracy, privacy protection, and workflow integration. In this study at Seoul National University Hospital Gangnam Center, South Korea, from June 2024 to May 2025, we conducted workflow mapping, user-requirement analysis, prototype development, and usability evaluation. Workflow analysis identified repetitive, protocol-dependent communication tasks across the screening service line. Screening center personnel reported that demand for GenAI was concentrated on improving workflow efficiency and reducing workload rather than supporting clinical decision-making. They prioritized pre-test guidance and automated test result explanation, while highlighting concerns about output accuracy, user acceptance, generational barriers, and privacy. An institution-specific retrieval-augmented generation chatbot showed favorable preliminary usability and received higher descriptive rankings than general-purpose artificial intelligence models in completeness, safety, and overall preference. These findings should be interpreted as preliminary usability evidence and require validation in larger evaluations. Overall, the findings support the potential role of GenAI as a human-supervised, institution-tailored workflow support tool in health screening services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-73939-0
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Implementing generative artificial intelligence in a tertiary hospital health screening center

Hyeong Won Yu, Eun Kyung Choe, Young Jun Lee, Ji Sun Park et al.
Scientific Reports
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Implementing generative artificial intelligence in a tertiary hospital health screening center

Hyeong Won Yu, Eun Kyung Choe, Young Jun Lee, Ji Sun Park, Min Young Baek, Cheol Min Lee, Seon cho, Hayeun Kim, Sung Hee Park, Junho Song
article en

Abstract

Abstract Health screening centers perform high-volume, repetitive, information-intensive tasks that may be well suited to generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), but safe implementation requires accuracy, privacy protection, and workflow integration. In this study at Seoul National University Hospital Gangnam Center, South Korea, from June 2024 to May 2025, we conducted workflow mapping, user-requirement analysis, prototype development, and usability evaluation. Workflow analysis identified repetitive, protocol-dependent communication tasks across the screening service line. Screening center personnel reported that demand for GenAI was concentrated on improving workflow efficiency and reducing workload rather than supporting clinical decision-making. They prioritized pre-test guidance and automated test result explanation, while highlighting concerns about output accuracy, user acceptance, generational barriers, and privacy. An institution-specific retrieval-augmented generation chatbot showed favorable preliminary usability and received higher descriptive rankings than general-purpose artificial intelligence models in completeness, safety, and overall preference. These findings should be interpreted as preliminary usability evidence and require validation in larger evaluations. Overall, the findings support the potential role of GenAI as a human-supervised, institution-tailored workflow support tool in health screening services.

Scientific Reports
Seoul National University (KR), New Generation University College (ET), Seoul National University Hospital (KR), Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR), SNUH SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center (KR), Korea Association of Health Promotion (KR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.