Physical preparation in football: An umbrella review based on a relational evidence framework

Background Physical preparation in football is embedded within microcycles through heterogeneous analytical and integrated tasks performed on and off the field. This fragmentation complicates synthesis and limits inferences about competitive performance. This umbrella review synthesised, classified, and evaluated systematic reviews and meta-analyses using a relational framework distinguishing four relationships: on-field training and game demands (C→A); training or competition and player response (C→B); complementary physical training and performance-support capacities (D→A); and complementary or preventive training and injury-related or functional indicators (D→B). Methods Following umbrella-review guidance, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus were searched for systematic reviews, with or without meta-analysis, published between January 2016 and June 2026 and addressing physical preparation in football. Two reviewers independently performed searching, selection, and data extraction. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2. Results Seventeen reviews were included: five addressed C→A, one C→B, three D→A, and eight D→B. Methodological quality was heterogeneous: two reviews were rated moderate-high, nine moderate, three low-moderate, two moderate-low, and one low. Evidence was strongest for physical support capacities, whereas training or competition and player response was least represented. Conclusion Physical preparation has stronger support for improving physical support capacities and preventive indicators than for demonstrating direct transfer to performance in play. The framework organises evidence by relationship type and delimits inferences, avoiding the assumption that improvements in capacities, player responses, or functional and injury-related indicators necessarily enhance competitive performance. Direct evidence of transfer to play remains limited; therefore, studies should evaluate how adaptations are expressed in representative tasks and competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541261492183
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Physical preparation in football: An umbrella review based on a relational evidence framework

Luis Manuel Martínez-Aranda, Antonio Aguilar Gómez
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sports Performance and Training
article

Physical preparation in football: An umbrella review based on a relational evidence framework

Luis Manuel Martínez-Aranda, Antonio Aguilar Gómez
article en

Abstract

Background Physical preparation in football is embedded within microcycles through heterogeneous analytical and integrated tasks performed on and off the field. This fragmentation complicates synthesis and limits inferences about competitive performance. This umbrella review synthesised, classified, and evaluated systematic reviews and meta-analyses using a relational framework distinguishing four relationships: on-field training and game demands (C→A); training or competition and player response (C→B); complementary physical training and performance-support capacities (D→A); and complementary or preventive training and injury-related or functional indicators (D→B). Methods Following umbrella-review guidance, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus were searched for systematic reviews, with or without meta-analysis, published between January 2016 and June 2026 and addressing physical preparation in football. Two reviewers independently performed searching, selection, and data extraction. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2. Results Seventeen reviews were included: five addressed C→A, one C→B, three D→A, and eight D→B. Methodological quality was heterogeneous: two reviews were rated moderate-high, nine moderate, three low-moderate, two moderate-low, and one low. Evidence was strongest for physical support capacities, whereas training or competition and player response was least represented. Conclusion Physical preparation has stronger support for improving physical support capacities and preventive indicators than for demonstrating direct transfer to performance in play. The framework organises evidence by relationship type and delimits inferences, avoiding the assumption that improvements in capacities, player responses, or functional and injury-related indicators necessarily enhance competitive performance. Direct evidence of transfer to play remains limited; therefore, studies should evaluate how adaptations are expressed in representative tasks and competition.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Universidad Pablo de Olavide (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.