Geographic access to triple negative breast cancer clinical trials: are trials located near patients?

Geographic proximity to clinical trials is a major barrier to trial participation, but geographic access to trials has not been specifically characterized for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We evaluated the geographic distribution of TNBC treatment trials across U.S. counties and examined associated social and demographic characteristics. All trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as of September 30, 2024 (n = 510,397) were queried, and active phase II and III TNBC treatment trials were identified through keyword searches. County-level population estimates from the 2018–2022 U.S. Census Bureau 5-year estimates and county adjacency data were used to evaluate trial availability and geographic access. Trial availability was examined according to sponsorship, rurality, health vulnerability, race and ethnicity, and U.S. region. We identified 108 active TNBC trials, including 58 (54%) for metastatic and 50 (46%) for non-metastatic disease. Overall, 76% of U.S. counties had no TNBC trials, 12% had exclusively federally sponsored trials, 10% had both federally and non-federally sponsored trials, and 2% had only non-federally sponsored trials. Trial availability was significantly lower in counties with the highest health vulnerability and in rural counties, which were more likely to rely exclusively on federally sponsored trials. Counties with predominantly Black, Hispanic, and American Indian and Alaska Native populations were less likely to have TNBC trials than predominantly non-Hispanic White counties. Women in the South were more likely than women in the Northeast to have no TNBC trial available in either their county of residence or a neighboring county. TNBC clinical trials are geographically concentrated across the United States, with substantial disparities in access affecting rural and highly vulnerable counties, counties with predominantly racial and ethnic minority populations, and women living in the South. Federally sponsored trials may play an important role in supporting trial availability in underserved areas. Expanding the geographic distribution of TNBC trials may help improve equitable access to clinical trial participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-026-08084-3
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Geographic access to triple negative breast cancer clinical trials: are trials located near patients?

Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, Mariana Chávez‐MacGregor, Laura A. Levit, Erin P. Balogh et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Geographic access to triple negative breast cancer clinical trials: are trials located near patients?

Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, Mariana Chávez‐MacGregor, Laura A. Levit, Erin P. Balogh, David Michael Waterhouse, Joseph M. Unger, Laura Burns Amin, M. Kelsey Kirkwood
article en

Abstract

Geographic proximity to clinical trials is a major barrier to trial participation, but geographic access to trials has not been specifically characterized for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We evaluated the geographic distribution of TNBC treatment trials across U.S. counties and examined associated social and demographic characteristics. All trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as of September 30, 2024 (n = 510,397) were queried, and active phase II and III TNBC treatment trials were identified through keyword searches. County-level population estimates from the 2018–2022 U.S. Census Bureau 5-year estimates and county adjacency data were used to evaluate trial availability and geographic access. Trial availability was examined according to sponsorship, rurality, health vulnerability, race and ethnicity, and U.S. region. We identified 108 active TNBC trials, including 58 (54%) for metastatic and 50 (46%) for non-metastatic disease. Overall, 76% of U.S. counties had no TNBC trials, 12% had exclusively federally sponsored trials, 10% had both federally and non-federally sponsored trials, and 2% had only non-federally sponsored trials. Trial availability was significantly lower in counties with the highest health vulnerability and in rural counties, which were more likely to rely exclusively on federally sponsored trials. Counties with predominantly Black, Hispanic, and American Indian and Alaska Native populations were less likely to have TNBC trials than predominantly non-Hispanic White counties. Women in the South were more likely than women in the Northeast to have no TNBC trial available in either their county of residence or a neighboring county. TNBC clinical trials are geographically concentrated across the United States, with substantial disparities in access affecting rural and highly vulnerable counties, counties with predominantly racial and ethnic minority populations, and women living in the South. Federally sponsored trials may play an important role in supporting trial availability in underserved areas. Expanding the geographic distribution of TNBC trials may help improve equitable access to clinical trial participation.

Breast Cancer Research and TreatmentVol. 219(3)
American Society of Clinical Oncology (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Oncology Hematology Care (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.