Scoping Review of Implementation Science in Digital Intervention Research for Substance Use Disorders

Objectives: Digital substance use interventions (DSUI) have demonstrated effectiveness in preventing, treating, and supporting recovery of substance use disorders (SUD), but their large-scale adoption and sustained implementation remain limited. To highlight the state of the science for DSUI implementation research, we conducted a scoping review of relevant studies of implementation of DSUI. Methods: We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses – Scoping Review guidelines. Search was conducted using keywords (eg, technology, substance use, implementation) in Medline, PsycINFO, and Health Technology Assessment databases. Studies without implementation data, protocols, reviews, editorials, and non-English papers were excluded. Publications were included through February 2023. We screened 4178 abstracts and 148 full texts using Covidence software. We extracted implementation-related data from the included studies and organized it using standardized terminology for implementation determinants, strategies, and outcomes. Results: The 48 studies represented implementation (n=7), determinant (n=8), and combined effectiveness and implementation studies or hybrid studies (n=33). Most common DSUI were treatment and recovery support approaches for general drug use, most frequently delivered as electronic programs on computers. Only 12 of 48 studies used implementation frameworks. Implementation strategies were rarely described. Acceptability was the most evaluated implementation outcome (n=26), and no study evaluated implementation costs. Evaluation of patient-level implementation determinants and longer-term sustainment outcomes was lacking. Conclusions: To accelerate translation and improve research rigor, future DSUI research should systematically apply implementation science frameworks to evaluate implementation determinants (including patient-level), document and test implementation strategies, and evaluate outcomes, including fidelity, cost, and sustainment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/adm.0000000000001780
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Scoping Review of Implementation Science in Digital Intervention Research for Substance Use Disorders

Caitlin Marie Reardon, Aimee N. C. Campbell, Deepika Rao, Madison K. Clement et al.
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Scoping Review of Implementation Science in Digital Intervention Research for Substance Use Disorders

Caitlin Marie Reardon, Aimee N. C. Campbell, Deepika Rao, Madison K. Clement, Lisa Saldana, Sarah E. Lord
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Digital substance use interventions (DSUI) have demonstrated effectiveness in preventing, treating, and supporting recovery of substance use disorders (SUD), but their large-scale adoption and sustained implementation remain limited. To highlight the state of the science for DSUI implementation research, we conducted a scoping review of relevant studies of implementation of DSUI. Methods: We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses – Scoping Review guidelines. Search was conducted using keywords (eg, technology, substance use, implementation) in Medline, PsycINFO, and Health Technology Assessment databases. Studies without implementation data, protocols, reviews, editorials, and non-English papers were excluded. Publications were included through February 2023. We screened 4178 abstracts and 148 full texts using Covidence software. We extracted implementation-related data from the included studies and organized it using standardized terminology for implementation determinants, strategies, and outcomes. Results: The 48 studies represented implementation (n=7), determinant (n=8), and combined effectiveness and implementation studies or hybrid studies (n=33). Most common DSUI were treatment and recovery support approaches for general drug use, most frequently delivered as electronic programs on computers. Only 12 of 48 studies used implementation frameworks. Implementation strategies were rarely described. Acceptability was the most evaluated implementation outcome (n=26), and no study evaluated implementation costs. Evaluation of patient-level implementation determinants and longer-term sustainment outcomes was lacking. Conclusions: To accelerate translation and improve research rigor, future DSUI research should systematically apply implementation science frameworks to evaluate implementation determinants (including patient-level), document and test implementation strategies, and evaluate outcomes, including fidelity, cost, and sustainment.

Journal of Addiction Medicine
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.