Clinical utility of prenatal exome sequencing after normal chromosomal microarray in fetuses with structural anomalies

Congenital anomalies detected by ultrasound occur in approximately 2–4% of pregnancies. Cytogenetic testing allows detection of chromosomal abnormalities, but the majority of fetuses remain without a diagnosis. It is in this context that exome sequencing was introduced into prenatal medicine. The objective of this study was to analyze the indications for this test, determine its diagnostic yield, and assess its impact on pregnancy outcome. Among the 68 fetuses included, exome sequencing identified pathogenic variants in 22 cases, corresponding to an overall diagnostic yield of 32%. Termination of pregnancy was requested in 86% of pregnancies with a positive exome result, compared with 35% of those cases with an inconclusive result ( P < 0.001). Nevertheless, in more than half of the cases, the result did not influence the decision to terminate. This study shows that exome sequencing improves the diagnosis of fetal anomalies in prenatal diagnosis and may influence pregnancy outcome. However, in many cases, the decision to terminate pregnancy was made before receiving exome sequencing results, highlighting its mainly diagnostic rather than decisional role.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Morphologie
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2026.101242
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Clinical utility of prenatal exome sequencing after normal chromosomal microarray in fetuses with structural anomalies

B. Demeer, F. Jobic, G. Jedraszak, M. Gallet et al.
Morphologie
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Clinical utility of prenatal exome sequencing after normal chromosomal microarray in fetuses with structural anomalies

B. Demeer, F. Jobic, G. Jedraszak, M. Gallet, K. Messaoudi, G. Morin, M. Perriere, W. Darwiche, S. Delmas Lanta, V. Magry, B. Bonte
article en

Abstract

Congenital anomalies detected by ultrasound occur in approximately 2–4% of pregnancies. Cytogenetic testing allows detection of chromosomal abnormalities, but the majority of fetuses remain without a diagnosis. It is in this context that exome sequencing was introduced into prenatal medicine. The objective of this study was to analyze the indications for this test, determine its diagnostic yield, and assess its impact on pregnancy outcome. Among the 68 fetuses included, exome sequencing identified pathogenic variants in 22 cases, corresponding to an overall diagnostic yield of 32%. Termination of pregnancy was requested in 86% of pregnancies with a positive exome result, compared with 35% of those cases with an inconclusive result ( P < 0.001). Nevertheless, in more than half of the cases, the result did not influence the decision to terminate. This study shows that exome sequencing improves the diagnosis of fetal anomalies in prenatal diagnosis and may influence pregnancy outcome. However, in many cases, the decision to terminate pregnancy was made before receiving exome sequencing results, highlighting its mainly diagnostic rather than decisional role.

MorphologieVol. 110(371)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie (FR), Université de Picardie Jules Verne (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clinical utility of prenatal exome sequencing after normal chromosomal microarray in fetuses with structural anomalies — B. Demeer, F. Jobic, et al. · Morphologie (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS