Cephalomedullary nail fixation of subtrochanteric femur fractures in older adults: Is 1 distal locking screw enough?

ABSTRACT Background: Subtrochanteric (ST) fractures are proximal femur fractures with strong deforming muscular forces, which complicate anatomical reduction and treatment. These fractures are fixed with intramedullary nails with 2 distal locking screws, although the need for both screws has never been researched. Purpose: This study's purpose was to investigate the use of 1 versus 2 distal locking screws on clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications. Study Design/Level of Evidence: Retrospective cohort, Level of Evidence III. Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective review of a consecutive series of ST femoral fractures was performed. Each patient's medical record was reviewed for demographics, injury and treatment information, perioperative details, radiographic parameters, hospital quality measures, and outcomes. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: 1 distal locking screw (1-screw cohort) and 2 distal locking screws (2-screw cohort). Distal screw number (1 vs. 2 screws) was chosen by surgeon preference. Comparative and multivariable analyses were conducted. Results: Two hundred thirty-two patients met inclusion criteria with a mean age of 71.18 ± 19.05 years and average follow-up of 11 months. All fractures were treated with a long antegrade, reamed cephalomedullary nail. Fifty (21.6%) patients were fixed with one 5 mm distal locking screw, and 182 (78.4%) patients had 2 screws. Patients with 1 screw had a shorter operative time in minutes (156.64 ± 47.06 vs. 176.06 ± 41.32, P = .005), but there were no further perioperative differences. Patients treated with 1 screw were more frequently associated with being fixed in a valgus coronal alignment (20% 1 distal screw vs. 5% 2 distal screws, P = .003) and had higher degree of apex anterior angulation (19.7° ± 8.2° 1-screw vs. 10.6° ± 6.3° 2-screw, P = .011). However, this did not significantly affect healing outcomes because both cohorts experienced similar rates of fracture healing, medical and mechanical complications, mortality, and readmission (all P > .050). Conclusion: Clinically, a single distal locking bolt is sufficient for ST femur fractures fixed with a cephalomedullary nail. A second distal locking screw may be reserved for situations in which the first screw may not have achieved adequate fixation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases/Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bh9.0000000000000058
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Cephalomedullary nail fixation of subtrochanteric femur fractures in older adults: Is 1 distal locking screw enough?

Steven M. Rivero, Manasa L. Kadiyala, Lauren A. Merrell, Abhishek Ganta et al.
Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases/Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

Cephalomedullary nail fixation of subtrochanteric femur fractures in older adults: Is 1 distal locking screw enough?

Steven M. Rivero, Manasa L. Kadiyala, Lauren A. Merrell, Abhishek Ganta, Kenneth A. Egol, Sanjit R. Konda
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Subtrochanteric (ST) fractures are proximal femur fractures with strong deforming muscular forces, which complicate anatomical reduction and treatment. These fractures are fixed with intramedullary nails with 2 distal locking screws, although the need for both screws has never been researched. Purpose: This study's purpose was to investigate the use of 1 versus 2 distal locking screws on clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications. Study Design/Level of Evidence: Retrospective cohort, Level of Evidence III. Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective review of a consecutive series of ST femoral fractures was performed. Each patient's medical record was reviewed for demographics, injury and treatment information, perioperative details, radiographic parameters, hospital quality measures, and outcomes. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: 1 distal locking screw (1-screw cohort) and 2 distal locking screws (2-screw cohort). Distal screw number (1 vs. 2 screws) was chosen by surgeon preference. Comparative and multivariable analyses were conducted. Results: Two hundred thirty-two patients met inclusion criteria with a mean age of 71.18 ± 19.05 years and average follow-up of 11 months. All fractures were treated with a long antegrade, reamed cephalomedullary nail. Fifty (21.6%) patients were fixed with one 5 mm distal locking screw, and 182 (78.4%) patients had 2 screws. Patients with 1 screw had a shorter operative time in minutes (156.64 ± 47.06 vs. 176.06 ± 41.32, P = .005), but there were no further perioperative differences. Patients treated with 1 screw were more frequently associated with being fixed in a valgus coronal alignment (20% 1 distal screw vs. 5% 2 distal screws, P = .003) and had higher degree of apex anterior angulation (19.7° ± 8.2° 1-screw vs. 10.6° ± 6.3° 2-screw, P = .011). However, this did not significantly affect healing outcomes because both cohorts experienced similar rates of fracture healing, medical and mechanical complications, mortality, and readmission (all P > .050). Conclusion: Clinically, a single distal locking bolt is sufficient for ST femur fractures fixed with a cephalomedullary nail. A second distal locking screw may be reserved for situations in which the first screw may not have achieved adequate fixation.

Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases/Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease
NYU Langone Health (US), Jamaica Hospital (US), New York University Langone Orthopedic Hospital (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.