Roman conquest and Late Hellenistic resilience: the epigraphical case of Aemilius Paullus’ monument at Delphi (167–100 BC)

Abstract Building on recent studies of classical resilience, this article scrutinizes the second-century BC inscriptions on the monument of Aemilius Paullus at Delphi, erected in 167 BC. By analysing the epigraphic reuse of its surfaces, the article posits that the Roman pillar played a crucial political role in the second century BC. It functioned as a material device used by Delphi, the Amphictyony and pro-Roman Greek agents to consolidate their interstate authority and legitimacy amidst the intricate military dominance of Rome and the influence of the Greek leagues. These inscriptions reveal the interplay of new pro-Roman elites, interstate arbitrations, Greek memorialization and Roman provincialization, all converging to signify the rapid transformations of this era. Consequently, this study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of Greek ideological adaptations to Roman power during this period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Hellenic Studies
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0075426926100597
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Roman conquest and Late Hellenistic resilience: the epigraphical case of Aemilius Paullus’ monument at Delphi (167–100 BC)

Juan Pablo Rodríguez Prieto
The Journal of Hellenic Studies
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

Roman conquest and Late Hellenistic resilience: the epigraphical case of Aemilius Paullus’ monument at Delphi (167–100 BC)

Juan Pablo Rodríguez Prieto
article en

Abstract

Abstract Building on recent studies of classical resilience, this article scrutinizes the second-century BC inscriptions on the monument of Aemilius Paullus at Delphi, erected in 167 BC. By analysing the epigraphic reuse of its surfaces, the article posits that the Roman pillar played a crucial political role in the second century BC. It functioned as a material device used by Delphi, the Amphictyony and pro-Roman Greek agents to consolidate their interstate authority and legitimacy amidst the intricate military dominance of Rome and the influence of the Greek leagues. These inscriptions reveal the interplay of new pro-Roman elites, interstate arbitrations, Greek memorialization and Roman provincialization, all converging to signify the rapid transformations of this era. Consequently, this study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of Greek ideological adaptations to Roman power during this period.

The Journal of Hellenic Studies
Universidad Andrés Bello (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.