I35f. FROM SHELF LIFE AND RELIABILITY TO CROSS-DOMAIN METROLOGY OF VIABILITY

Shelf life of a product, reliability of a technical object, viability of a cell, resilience of an ecosystem, and the ability of a dynamic system to remain within an admissible state space are measured using different methods and have different operational definitions. Thus, particular aspects of functional preservation, resilience, and viability are already objects of quantitative investigation. Existing measures, however, belong to different domains, rely on different primary quantities, and do not automatically constitute a common metrology of viability. This paper investigates whether a cross-domain measurable coordinate can be defined that does not replace existing physical, chemical, biological, or other quantities, but instead characterizes the relation of a system's state to its operationally defined domain Norm and to subsequent viability. The candidate construct considered is the HNU — Harmony Norm Unit. At the present stage, HNU is not declared to be an established universal unit and is not proposed as a new unit of the International System of Units, SI. Instead, the conditions are formulated that a candidate HNU must satisfy before it can be distinguished from an arbitrary normalization of existing indicators. For this purpose, the Cross-Domain Metrological Gate (CDMG) is proposed. It includes domain validity, operational correspondence, prospective validity, added discriminatory capacity, negative-control discrimination, anti-surrogacy, normalization robustness, and independent cross-domain reproducibility. The central hypothesis is not that different systems possess identical physical properties, but that a common measurement relation may exist: Measured State → Domain Norm → Relative State → Subsequent Viability Conditions for falsification are explicitly formulated. If candidate HNU provides no reproducible information about subsequent viability beyond strong domain-specific models, or if its apparent cross-domain meaning is determined by arbitrary mathematical normalization, the hypothesis of a common measurable viability coordinate is not empirically supported. Keywords: Vitology; viability; metrology; HNU; Harmony Norm; Scientific Subtraction; A9DDC; CDMG; cross-domain measurement; reliability; shelf life; resilience; domain norm; added discriminatory capacity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23008567
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

I35f. FROM SHELF LIFE AND RELIABILITY TO CROSS-DOMAIN METROLOGY OF VIABILITY

Serhii Hostiunin
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
article

I35f. FROM SHELF LIFE AND RELIABILITY TO CROSS-DOMAIN METROLOGY OF VIABILITY

Serhii Hostiunin
article en

Abstract

Shelf life of a product, reliability of a technical object, viability of a cell, resilience of an ecosystem, and the ability of a dynamic system to remain within an admissible state space are measured using different methods and have different operational definitions. Thus, particular aspects of functional preservation, resilience, and viability are already objects of quantitative investigation. Existing measures, however, belong to different domains, rely on different primary quantities, and do not automatically constitute a common metrology of viability. This paper investigates whether a cross-domain measurable coordinate can be defined that does not replace existing physical, chemical, biological, or other quantities, but instead characterizes the relation of a system's state to its operationally defined domain Norm and to subsequent viability. The candidate construct considered is the HNU — Harmony Norm Unit. At the present stage, HNU is not declared to be an established universal unit and is not proposed as a new unit of the International System of Units, SI. Instead, the conditions are formulated that a candidate HNU must satisfy before it can be distinguished from an arbitrary normalization of existing indicators. For this purpose, the Cross-Domain Metrological Gate (CDMG) is proposed. It includes domain validity, operational correspondence, prospective validity, added discriminatory capacity, negative-control discrimination, anti-surrogacy, normalization robustness, and independent cross-domain reproducibility. The central hypothesis is not that different systems possess identical physical properties, but that a common measurement relation may exist: Measured State → Domain Norm → Relative State → Subsequent Viability Conditions for falsification are explicitly formulated. If candidate HNU provides no reproducible information about subsequent viability beyond strong domain-specific models, or if its apparent cross-domain meaning is determined by arbitrary mathematical normalization, the hypothesis of a common measurable viability coordinate is not empirically supported. Keywords: Vitology; viability; metrology; HNU; Harmony Norm; Scientific Subtraction; A9DDC; CDMG; cross-domain measurement; reliability; shelf life; resilience; domain norm; added discriminatory capacity.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

I35f. FROM SHELF LIFE AND RELIABILITY TO CROSS-DOMAIN METROLOGY OF VIABILITY — Serhii Hostiunin · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS