Advancing soil science using rare earth element tracing: Review, limitations and perspectives

Rare earth elements (REEs), owing to their unique geochemical properties, have emerged as versatile tracers for investigating soil processes. However, most REE tracing studies remain application-specific, and systematic evaluation of tracing strategies, methodological uncertainties, and future development pathways is still lacking. This review summarizes two fundamental REE tracing strategies, namely active labeling and passive fingerprinting. Active labeling introduces artificial REE tracers to track short‑term soil particle movement. Passive fingerprinting uses inherent REE distributions and anomalies to interpret material sources and soil processes operating over longer periods. The geochemical principles, methodological frameworks, and applications of both strategies in soil formation, environmental source tracing, soil redistribution, aggregate dynamics, and subsurface transport are evaluated. Major uncertainties arise from particle-size-selective adsorption and transport, non-conservative REE behavior, heterogeneous backgrounds, scale mismatch, and bulk digestion signals that integrate reactive and resistant mineral pools. Methodological progress therefore depends on standardized background characterization, minimally disruptive labeling, calibration across particle size fractions, and explicit propagation of uncertainty. Further advances will require portable detection, nested observations across scales, and integration with complementary isotopic proxies. By distinguishing between tracing strategies and matching analytical designs to process scales, this review provides a critical basis for more reliable, comparable, and scale-aware applications of REEs in soil science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2026.2737150
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Advancing soil science using rare earth element tracing: Review, limitations and perspectives

Mohamed A. M. Abd Elbasit, Desmond E. Walling, Gang Liu, Ya Liu et al.
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
article

Advancing soil science using rare earth element tracing: Review, limitations and perspectives

Mohamed A. M. Abd Elbasit, Desmond E. Walling, Gang Liu, Ya Liu, Chenxi Dan, Chengbo Shu, Qiong Zhang, Kaishan Song, Xining Zhao, Zhen Guo
article en

Abstract

Rare earth elements (REEs), owing to their unique geochemical properties, have emerged as versatile tracers for investigating soil processes. However, most REE tracing studies remain application-specific, and systematic evaluation of tracing strategies, methodological uncertainties, and future development pathways is still lacking. This review summarizes two fundamental REE tracing strategies, namely active labeling and passive fingerprinting. Active labeling introduces artificial REE tracers to track short‑term soil particle movement. Passive fingerprinting uses inherent REE distributions and anomalies to interpret material sources and soil processes operating over longer periods. The geochemical principles, methodological frameworks, and applications of both strategies in soil formation, environmental source tracing, soil redistribution, aggregate dynamics, and subsurface transport are evaluated. Major uncertainties arise from particle-size-selective adsorption and transport, non-conservative REE behavior, heterogeneous backgrounds, scale mismatch, and bulk digestion signals that integrate reactive and resistant mineral pools. Methodological progress therefore depends on standardized background characterization, minimally disruptive labeling, calibration across particle size fractions, and explicit propagation of uncertainty. Further advances will require portable detection, nested observations across scales, and integration with complementary isotopic proxies. By distinguishing between tracing strategies and matching analytical designs to process scales, this review provides a critical basis for more reliable, comparable, and scale-aware applications of REEs in soil science.

Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University of Exeter (GB), Sol Plaatje University (ZA), Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology (CN), Institute of Soil and Water Conservation (CN), Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China (CN), Northwest A&F University (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.