‘Not for me’: Reasons for (non)participation in science communication activities on Artificial Intelligence in the Netherlands

Artificial intelligence operates in a social context and affects everyone. Organizing science communication and engagement activities on the topic for all groups in society is therefore recommendable. However, research shows that mainly higher educated, already engaged citizens participate in science communication activities. To address this gap, our study collected insights from underrepresented citizens in the Netherlands regarding their views on and participation in science communication activities related to artificial intelligence. Using semi-structured interviews (n = 19), we qualitatively explored reasons for (non)participation. Participants knew more about AI than they initially reported, and worldviews were evoked in expressing both concerns and curiosity about AI. AI was deemed relevant but news about the topic was avoided due to a lack of trust. Non participation in engagement or communication activity was driven by both practical and social barriers. Following participants' advice, we suggest a personal approach could help to make these activities more inviting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Understanding of Science
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625261486785
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

‘Not for me’: Reasons for (non)participation in science communication activities on Artificial Intelligence in the Netherlands

Anne M. Dijkstra, Pien Spanjaard
Public Understanding of Science
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

‘Not for me’: Reasons for (non)participation in science communication activities on Artificial Intelligence in the Netherlands

Anne M. Dijkstra, Pien Spanjaard
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence operates in a social context and affects everyone. Organizing science communication and engagement activities on the topic for all groups in society is therefore recommendable. However, research shows that mainly higher educated, already engaged citizens participate in science communication activities. To address this gap, our study collected insights from underrepresented citizens in the Netherlands regarding their views on and participation in science communication activities related to artificial intelligence. Using semi-structured interviews (n = 19), we qualitatively explored reasons for (non)participation. Participants knew more about AI than they initially reported, and worldviews were evoked in expressing both concerns and curiosity about AI. AI was deemed relevant but news about the topic was avoided due to a lack of trust. Non participation in engagement or communication activity was driven by both practical and social barriers. Following participants' advice, we suggest a personal approach could help to make these activities more inviting.

Public Understanding of Science
University of Twente (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘Not for me’: Reasons for (non)participation in science communication activities on Artificial Intelligence in the Netherlands — Anne M. Dijkstra, Pien Spanjaard · Public Understanding of Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS