Labor Under Strain: The Latin American Right and the Politics of Market Reform

Abstract What explains differences in labor market reforms among conservative governments in Latin America during the 2010s–20s? Analyzing the 2000s “pink tide” as a critical juncture, we argue that two policy legacies account for this cross-national variation. First, the degree of labor movement empowerment under leftist governments conditioned whether subsequent conservative administrations pursued radical or more moderate reforms. Second, labor movement cohesion—shaped by the encompassment of confederations, partisan alignments, and bargaining institutions—determined whether governments pursued inequitable (targeting specific segments of the workforce) or equitable reforms. We analyze the administrations of Temer and Bolsonaro in Brazil, Macri and Milei in Argentina, and Lacalle Pou in Uruguay. Our main contributions are to examine the seldom-explored distributional equity of austerity reforms in Latin America, demonstrating that under conditions of acute fiscal stress the public–private divide becomes a central dimension of labor market reform, and to introduce labor movement cohesion as a new explanatory variable in labor policy analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Latin American Politics and Society
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2026.10070
Primary Topic
Politics and Society in Latin America
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Labor Under Strain: The Latin American Right and the Politics of Market Reform

Olivia Berisso, Andrés Schipani, Tomás Divizia
Latin American Politics and Society
Politics and Society in Latin America
article

Labor Under Strain: The Latin American Right and the Politics of Market Reform

Olivia Berisso, Andrés Schipani, Tomás Divizia
article en

Abstract

Abstract What explains differences in labor market reforms among conservative governments in Latin America during the 2010s–20s? Analyzing the 2000s “pink tide” as a critical juncture, we argue that two policy legacies account for this cross-national variation. First, the degree of labor movement empowerment under leftist governments conditioned whether subsequent conservative administrations pursued radical or more moderate reforms. Second, labor movement cohesion—shaped by the encompassment of confederations, partisan alignments, and bargaining institutions—determined whether governments pursued inequitable (targeting specific segments of the workforce) or equitable reforms. We analyze the administrations of Temer and Bolsonaro in Brazil, Macri and Milei in Argentina, and Lacalle Pou in Uruguay. Our main contributions are to examine the seldom-explored distributional equity of austerity reforms in Latin America, demonstrating that under conditions of acute fiscal stress the public–private divide becomes a central dimension of labor market reform, and to introduce labor movement cohesion as a new explanatory variable in labor policy analysis.

Latin American Politics and Society
University of San Andrés (AR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Politics and Society in Latin America
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Labor Under Strain: The Latin American Right and the Politics of Market Reform — Olivia Berisso, Andrés Schipani, et al. · Latin American Politics and Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS