Electronic Health Record Workflows in Acute Care Surgery: Ethnographic Study

Abstract Background Systematic strategies to harness electronic health record (EHR) workflows, reduce redundancy, and support decision-making remain limited in acute care surgery (ACS). Understanding how EHR systems and workflows intersect with time-sensitive settings is critical to improving decision-making and outcomes in ACS. Objective This study aimed to evaluate how ACS clinicians leverage the EHR for decision-making and to identify opportunities and challenges for EHR-enabled decision support. Methods We conducted a qualitative ethnographic study over a 6-month period, combining in-depth interviews with 15 ACS surgeons and providers and 100 hours of “paired fieldwork” observations spanning the entire perioperative arc by a surgical provider and an organizational sociologist. Using constructivist grounded theory, we identified the enablers, challenges, and opportunities for EHR-enabled decision-making in ACS. Results Surgeons fell into two groups: (1) those who accepted information overload as inherent to the EHR, relying on generic templates and standard attestations, and (2) others who viewed it as a problem to fix, actively correcting errors and composing individualized summaries. Ambiguity in billing requirements drove overdocumentation, resulting in “note bloat” that obscured high-yield information. EHR use during decision-making focused primarily on risk assessment, though navigation challenges hindered access to critical data. Forecasting key outcomes that alter management or facilitate shared decision-making was seen as valuable. Automated risk stratification, generated from live EHR data while minimizing alert fatigue, was seen as a potential solution. Conclusions ACS clinicians use various tactics to navigate EHR challenges and focus on high-value tasks. Streamlined risk assessment using EHR data may strengthen decision-making in critical moments, but solutions must integrate seamlessly within existing workflows to provide rapid and accurate outputs that prioritize meaningful outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Medical Informatics
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/89846
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Electronic Health Record Workflows in Acute Care Surgery: Ethnographic Study

Devesh Narayanan, Aussama Khalaf Nassar, Kristan Staudenmayer, Alex Lee et al.
JMIR Medical Informatics
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

Electronic Health Record Workflows in Acute Care Surgery: Ethnographic Study

Devesh Narayanan, Aussama Khalaf Nassar, Kristan Staudenmayer, Alex Lee, Syed Morad Hameed
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Systematic strategies to harness electronic health record (EHR) workflows, reduce redundancy, and support decision-making remain limited in acute care surgery (ACS). Understanding how EHR systems and workflows intersect with time-sensitive settings is critical to improving decision-making and outcomes in ACS. Objective This study aimed to evaluate how ACS clinicians leverage the EHR for decision-making and to identify opportunities and challenges for EHR-enabled decision support. Methods We conducted a qualitative ethnographic study over a 6-month period, combining in-depth interviews with 15 ACS surgeons and providers and 100 hours of “paired fieldwork” observations spanning the entire perioperative arc by a surgical provider and an organizational sociologist. Using constructivist grounded theory, we identified the enablers, challenges, and opportunities for EHR-enabled decision-making in ACS. Results Surgeons fell into two groups: (1) those who accepted information overload as inherent to the EHR, relying on generic templates and standard attestations, and (2) others who viewed it as a problem to fix, actively correcting errors and composing individualized summaries. Ambiguity in billing requirements drove overdocumentation, resulting in “note bloat” that obscured high-yield information. EHR use during decision-making focused primarily on risk assessment, though navigation challenges hindered access to critical data. Forecasting key outcomes that alter management or facilitate shared decision-making was seen as valuable. Automated risk stratification, generated from live EHR data while minimizing alert fatigue, was seen as a potential solution. Conclusions ACS clinicians use various tactics to navigate EHR challenges and focus on high-value tasks. Streamlined risk assessment using EHR data may strengthen decision-making in critical moments, but solutions must integrate seamlessly within existing workflows to provide rapid and accurate outputs that prioritize meaningful outcomes.

JMIR Medical InformaticsVol. 14
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.